![]() |
Thorvalla - Cancelled
While we were away Guido Henkel pulled the plug on the Thorvalla Kickstarter.
Quote:
|
It took them 2 months to prep that campaign? Really? It wasn't a bad concept at all, I think there is plenty of latent interest in the subject matter. The problem in my opinion was the complete lack of organization, content and detail. Generally you have to show some pre-existing assets… or at least say its the spritual successor to Baldur's Gate (apparently :)).
|
And indeed, nothing on possibly starting it again, as they had noted before. Such a shame, there were some real ideas in there, but the pitch was flawed (though the updates did a good job) and the media coverage nihil. Too bad.
|
Not surprising, but still disappointing.
|
I consider this a shame. The later updates were actually pretty good, and made it seem like quite an interesting game. I honestly believe they would've done a lot better if they had started out with more of a bang.
|
I take it as proven there's no commercially viable target group for a really old-school RPG with TB combat and a simplified overland travel map (they really had guts to suggest that!). Not anywhere near enough to get you to 1m anyway.
|
Nah, I think he just didn't doa good job of laying out what it was at the beginning, so he missed out on a lot of that buzz.
|
It's pretty clear that people are becoming more demanding with regards to what is considered an interesting pitch. But there were a lot of things going against this one: trying to make it "famous dev" campaign with a relatively unknown name (Guido who?), claiming some authorship on "Torment" when PE had just done the same. People being busted from several large KS RPG campaigns this year, approaching holiday season… Press fatigue with KS. Failure to build enough community and awareness prior to the launch…
|
Please try it again in Spring.
|
Quote:
|
A really interesting thing is happening lately in Kickstarter: people are getting fed up with the whole thing, and I believe this is because they realized that:
- even with a successful Kickstarter, the game still needs about 1-1.5 years to make, - certain high-profile, successful KS-projects lost the vibe, because the devs are busy making the game instead of answering ridiculous fan pleas over the forums Sooo… I guess the majority of people just simply realized by now that funding a KS-campaign is NOT the same as storming to the store and buying the game. |
Quote:
Quote:
But if I'm a reflection of any group of people out there, right about now I'm feeling 'kickstarter burnout' because there has been just too many project announcments at around the same time. Nobody is to blame for this, it just is what it is. I can only personally afford to back a few games at a time. So after I've backed a few games, even if another kickstarter gets announced that I like, I can't really back it anymore because I'll break my budget. |
The number of games funded through KS is already large. Will keep increasing.
The only fatigue to be seen is when people focus on the failures and forget about the successes. Just take a look at the KS screen on video games tag, many other games are funded before the end of the campaign. |
Quote:
|
Case Number Two:
Another high-profile KS seems to be in the same shoes: David Braben (game legend!) announced that the Elite (a game legend!) sequel (yaaay, wetting my pants!) is underway (yeeeeehhhaaaaa!) - IF the KS pledge is successful. The pitch is god-awful, but who cares?????? It's the sequel of a friggin' legend, best game evar, etc!!!!! Okay, enthusiasm mode turned off, back to reality: Elite: Dangerous's KS campaign is a troubled one. So, the promise is absolutely there, what happened? Why the fund not hit the roof by 400%? I have two theories: 1. You have to be a really old f*rt to actually know what Elite is (or who David Braben is). The current generation of gamers are clearly left cold by the pitch. 2. An ambitious project like this needs time, and we, gamers, want to play the thing NOW! Mr Braben is definitely no Peter Molyneux (you may hate the guy for Fable, but he is a truly gifted media manipulator, hats off), and the info he hints indicates that the project will be a very long development (ambition hits the roof). Unfortunately, both cases are valid for Thorvalla. So, to sum it up: sparkling up a few cool ideas and relying on nostalgia alone is not enough. You have to hire a good PR guy or agency, you must have a credible track record, PLUS you have to show something already in the works to convince Average Joe Jr. to click on the Pledge button. Well, it ain't easy, and most importantly, ain't cheap. Hence the big publisher houses risk nothing and try to make surefire products: because the preparation alone takes immense risks - and this is what many indie developers cannot afford. Okay, enough rant. Back to play Realms of Arkania :) |
Quote:
|
Not a surprise really. To be honest, I was a little put off by the pretentiousness of the descriptions. I have no idea who legendary designer Guido Henkel is, so the name recognition factor didn't work. Then the game illustrations were just crude sketches and the map was pretty vanilla. With Project Eternity, I at least had some past examples of similar games for comparison: IE; plus I recognized some of the names and I found the map appealing. For this game there was nothing to go on, so I had no idea whether it would be the type of game I like to play. Hence it was difficult to find much enthusiasm for this pitch, and the complete lack of momentum pretty much killed it.
Note that I've not lost any interest or enthusiasm in KS; quite the contrary. But I'm still going to be a selective consumer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch