Thread: A Thought
View Single Post

Default 

November 1st, 2008, 15:24
Imho another proof of the "commercialization of games" is that some games are treated merely as a tool, not as a game.

Let's take the classic example: Halo 1. Used as a tool by Microsoft to promote another platform.
It was NOT treated as a game, but merrely as a promotional tool by Microsoft.

Similar things have happened to som other games, too.

This means that people stripped the meaning of a game being a game totally from that game (Halo 1, in this example), which resulted in its use as a promoting tool.

If this game had been regarded as a game, then it would've been treated differently, imho, putting the play into the foreground, not its use as a promotional tool.

Which would have imho resulted in a different developing cycle.

Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
Alrik Fassbauer is offline

Alrik Fassbauer

Alrik Fassbauer's Avatar
TL;DR

#71

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 16,004