View Single Post


February 26th, 2010, 02:21
Your question is inaccurate. Dubya wasn't a tax-n-spender. He cut taxes. Remember? That's how he managed that ridiculous deficit y'all love to remind us of every 30 seconds. That is also one of the reasons why Obama set the tea partiers off—he ran his campaign on a planned and unabashed tax increase. Since the election, he's spent more than Dubya ever dreamed. Barack Christ jammed thru congress the biggest deficit budget in history (eclipsing the worst of the great satan, Dubya). THAT is tax-n-spend, Mike.

Actually, if it weren't for a few specific issues (return to the gold standard, extreme isolationist policy), I'd probably be libertarian myself. Because of those issues, I identify as repub like I did under Saint Ron, which unfortunately puts me under the same umbrella as the bible thumpers and Sarah Palin.

Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: Still afraid to hope / / Detroit Red Wings: Another rollercoaster season?
dteowner is offline


dteowner's Avatar


Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 11,383