View Single Post

Default 

February 28th, 2010, 19:04
Not comment about this review specifically (i can understand and accept this opinion) but just in general … I don't get that how in the rpg community it often seems accepted and non-contradictory to argue that Bioshock 2 is utter crap and ME2 is the best thing that ever happened to rpgs ?

There is very little difference between these two games IMO. Both are "shooters with some story behind " and minor and superficial rpg elements. I personally preferred Bioshock 2 more than ME2, but I wasn't being told constantly that I was playing a revolutionary rpg so my expectations were more realistic.

I'm sure it has something to do with Bioshock professing to be carrying on the justifiably beloved System Shock tradition and ME2 is not. However, that cannot fully explain the huge dichotomy here.
dagoo7 is offline

dagoo7

Watchdog

#5

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 181