View Single Post

Default 

May 5th, 2011, 23:52
OK, it's worth far more than $4. I didn't mean it as a criticism, but it came off that way.

I still contend that it's an art direction problem versus "bad graphics." I think the quality of the graphics is fine, and probably really good for 2002. But it's drab and uninspired looking. Nothing looks particularly interesting, regardless of how the textures are, or polygons or whatever.
Ovenall is offline

Ovenall

Ovenall's Avatar
SasqWatch

#28

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Downtown Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,005