View Single Post

Default 

May 24th, 2011, 11:18
Originally Posted by Thaurin View Post
I saw sakichop's thread, he posted the following, and because he only wanted positive response, I made my own thread:


I was just thinking about this last night, but in opposite directions. I was thinking that, having seen quite a lot of beautiful console games, the graphics in The Witcher 2 wouldn't even need to get dialed back that much to be able to run on them. A little more pop-in, some lower-quality textures, and you're almost there. My point is, some console games, like Final Fantasy XIII that I had been playing before, are really up there in the graphics department.

Which got me thinking: am I just being too hard on the game here, am I just not seeing it, or is this really the current high-end state of PC graphics? Then I got a little disappointed, because frankly, while the graphics look good, they don't blow me away.

I don't know what I'm expecting. Maybe a little more than just more detail in the scenery and level-of-detail? Revolutionary new effect never seen before? (TW2's lighting effects are pretty nice, of course.) But I can't help but feel that I've seen better graphics in some console games, mostly because of the competent art direction and cinematic design of the developers.
I don't know what you're smoking, honestly.

I run the game on full details - and it absolutely trounces every single console game I've seen.

Especially in terms of the textures and density of detail. Look at the forest areas at Flotsam - and there's simply no comparison.

Take a look at the game while checking out a console game at the same time, and all will become clear.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#3

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,798