View Single Post

Default 

May 27th, 2011, 17:17
I'm not going to read it but I find a 6/10 more convincing than the endless parade of >9/10.
As I see it reviewers should only touch 9 when they are absolutely convinced that what they are reviewing is about to make a significant impact in human culture as a whole and the final 10th point should only be awarded by 'history'.

Then again giving scores like the reviewer is some sort of school teacher is just dumb.
--
"I am not interested in good; I am interested in new, even if this includes the possibility of it's being evil"
(LaMonte Young, 1962)
holeraw is offline

holeraw

holeraw's Avatar
V.G.A.

#46

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 693