Originally Posted by DArtagnan
You're the one saying the world would be crumbling, not I.
Did hippies distribute their resources evenly?
Did they have the technology to govern their laws? Did they have hardware within their bodies with information that all had access to?
In my concept, people don't do what's "best for everyone" as such. They simply don't pursue goals that directly affect others negatively - because it won't be possible.
So the world hasn't actually improved here?