View Single Post

Default 

April 30th, 2012, 13:35
Originally Posted by Mr Smiley View Post
In such a world I would have no reason to argue otherwise, would I?
What? In such a world you'd actually have a good reason.

I'm not pretending. It has no real relevance. If you pay attention to the looks of an interviewer, you are being distracted from the content of the actual interview. (Which might be a good thing if the interview is boring.) I agree that It's a fact of life that people are distracted by appearances all the time. That doesn't make appearances relevant, though.
Are you seriously suggesting the appearance of Felicia Day is irrelevant to her public persona?

Maybe it SHOULD be irrelevant - but if that was the case, we might not ever have heard of her.

If KapitanUnterhosen intended to underline that superficiality rather than being superficial himself, he failed to communicate that to me.
Are you saying that because you didn't understand his meaning, he's implicitly at fault somehow?

I think his meaning was blatantly clear - and I find it surprising that you didn't get it. Whether he was being superficial as well, I can't really say. I don't think that's relevant to the message.
DArtagnan is online now

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#38

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,816