View Single Post

Default 

June 19th, 2012, 09:24
There would be no point setting up a regulator if they had a conflict of interest?

You could also say there would be no point setting up a regulator if the regulator do not regulate the potentially most harmful people.

Yet it looks like the situation right on. Developpers due to their situation are the most credible yet their speech is not regulated.

There is one reason to set up a regulator: if the regulator can make a profit of the activity.
If yes, then no other reason is needed.
ChienAboyeur is offline

ChienAboyeur

SasqWatch

#44

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,012