Originally Posted by dteowner
Yep, exactly. I think it's a minor step - but a step nonethless. If we can reduce the amount of internet that can be accessed by potential internet stalkers (it's key to realise that internet stalkers are not born that way - and you don't have magical detectors for when they turn to stalking) - then we're saving lives. Anyone against that is not thinking straight.

Wow, what a pathetic stretch - even for you. If you think you can reasonably compare the damage from "internet stalkers" to violent gun-related crimes or traffic accidents, taking into account the positives of all three - you really need to switch meds.

Have you tried arguing your case instead of inadvertently supporting my point of view? Because that's what you're doing.