View Single Post

Default 

February 12th, 2013, 01:03
Originally Posted by TheMadGamer View Post
I don't really know why anyone would 'complain' about a player house in the game. There's no down side to it and if the developer wants to put it in because it will make some people happy then I think the appropriate response is 'thank you.'
yes there is a downside to it. It uses resources (lots of art, time, etc) and it doesn't add to the gameplay. Now, you could say that player housing in itself is gameplay, but is it really? Why not add a casino, bungee jumping, swimming competitions, bowling and tightrope walking?

A AAA game with tens of millions of $ budget can afford to add those 'side things', but a smaller developer team shouldn't. Obviously, that's just my opinion.
wolfing is offline

wolfing

wolfing's Avatar
Wonders what SasqWatch is

#7

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tardis
Posts: 3,294