View Single Post

Default 

June 4th, 2013, 04:44
Originally Posted by Kostaz View Post
Half-Life
I've been putting off the HLs till now due to being aware of the series being "abandoned" midway-through by Valve and the debacle surrounding episode 3 or HL3. Nevertheless I decided my hunger for sci-fi could be satisfied with a fix by the critically acclaimed FPS series.

So far I feel let down. I realise that hindsight is 20/20 and that there are 14 years separating my playthrough and the game's release but I can't quite wrap my head around Half-Life 1's reputation. To put it simply, to me, the game's gameplay first and foremost, and its (comparative lack of) story/atmosphere as a sidenote indicated its nowhere near the timeless classic the ratings would suggest. My only possible explanation is that the innovating and the otherwise great aspects of the game were so widely adopted by the genre that part of the appeal of the original has suffered (kinda like Seven Samurai in cinema).

My critique has obviously nothing to do with the technical merits of the game. The graphics and the AI are in fact impressive for its age and the high res/poly version that I played looked like a 2002 game rather than a 1998 one.

Gameplay-wise however I expected something that sets it aside from both the other old titles I've played and the random FPS garbage I've layed my hands on throughout the years (I'm not very picky in this genre since the games are short). To my disappointment there wasn't much apart from the usual shooting, button pushing, airvent crawling, jumping platforms all in a very controlled environment and on-rails.

The story/atmosphere on the other hand appear almost nonexistent given how famous Gordon Freeman is as a character and how the HL franchise was supposedly heavy on the story side.
First of all —> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNbkSgEaDZ4.

There's no way you're going to get an accurate impression of how good a game was for its time when you wait 15 years to play it.

That said, I'm not sure why you thought HL was supposed to be "heavy on the story side". I've never known it to have that reputation, especially given that it uses a silent protagonist. To me, HL was more known for the setting and atmosphere which I thought were incredible for back then and are still great by today's standards. In fact, I just played Black Mesa around 8-9 months ago, and it reminded me of how special HL was for its time.

That's not to say that HL doesn't have a great story because I still think it does. It's just not "story-heavy" in the same sense as other games. The story unfolds through the eyes of Gordan Freeman with no cutscenes and very little dialogue with other characters.

If I had known you were going to play it though, I would have suggested that you waited for the final release of Black Mesa. The original release version has not aged well imo.
JDR13 is online now

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#1327

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 18,297