View Single Post

Default 

July 1st, 2013, 14:34
Originally Posted by Kordanor View Post
I'd disagree and would judge the game individually.

I mean in FO2 had written on the cover "FO1 experience needed!" I'd agree with you.
But it's an individual game and you might play it without ever experiencing FO1.

Or asked the other way around: If you had to tell someone whether he should play FO1 or FO2 (he cant play both), which would you recommend?

What do you think about other "classic" game series like Eye of the Beholder, Might and Magic (3-5, 6-8), Ishar or Realms of Arkania (if you leave the 3rd one out) as sequels in these are also mostly "more of the same"?
I agree.

Playing two extremely similar games back-to-back will tend to taint the experience of the last game unfairly.

By then you will have grown weary of the flaws and even the best aspects will start to lose their luster after too much exposure. It's just the nature of the beast.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#20

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,047