View Single Post

Default 

July 10th, 2013, 12:12
Originally Posted by Myrthos View Post
Apparently it is objective as 70% thinks it should be ranked as a 7 or more. A very vocal minority feels it really sucks. That is based on 286K voters.
Even if I would factor in my expectations on how these numbers might be skewed by paid bots voting for the movie the average ranking would still be that it is an average movie, not something that is considered abysmally bad.

I still have to to see the movie for myself though.
If you think the majority vote has anything to do with objective quality - then you're very mistaken indeed.

There's no objective way to establish quality of a movie.

If you look at the ratings for movies like Avatar and Titanic - I suspect you'll get my point.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#2150

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,911