View Single Post

Default 

August 1st, 2013, 23:53
Originally Posted by GhanBuriGhan View Post
Looking at both statements, it seems pretty clear to me that at least two partys here, the new shareholder as well as bitcomposer have a share in this. And probably Coreplay as well - not going to a meeting just because you don't have time for "play for time bullshit" how are you gonna solve shit if you don't talk? And posting your reply on the Codex, acting the honest "we do it for the art" developer? I don't know. And since I don't know, until they sort this out I'll just assume that they are all crooks, and the game would have sucked anyway.
Yes, I don't understand why Coreplay failed to attend that meeting - what was it they had to do that was more important? In reality it's impossible to work this out with the information provided by both sides so far, but it looks like someones feathers have got ruffled and they are behaving like children.
Roq is offline

Roq

Seeker
RPGWatch Donor

#19

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Somerset/London UK
Posts: 977