View Single Post

Default 

October 22nd, 2013, 23:15
I don't see where I disputed that particular fact in the slightest.

You've called man's influence the driving factor in the equation, then introduced a laundry list of global/stellar mechanisms that minimized man's influence in the equation. The word you chose was "amplify", which implies it's not the primary signal. I've accepted your pet mechanism (Cycles) without dispute. I've agreed with your evidence and interpretation that man is merely the flea on the dog here. Mother Nature is moving the global temperature on an astronomical field while we're merely making a bad situation worse. I couldn't be more agreeable here.

So again, why are you so hot to trot on fossil fuels when that's a minor component of something that's merely an amplifier anyway?

Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: Still afraid to hope / / Detroit Red Wings: Another rollercoaster season?
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#44

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 11,340