Pope Francis describes ‘ideological Christians’ as a ‘serious illness’
View Single Post
December 18th, 2013, 18:06
Originally Posted by
LOL ok, he is having a bad day but he has also mentioned "detect"
Personally, I find the blind certainty and condescending attitudes of both sides of this debate (more the broader argument than this specific thread) to be ridiculous and annoying, so since we're already wallowing in Loopy Land, allow me to throw some mineral spirits on the fire.
On its face, the following is completely asinine and I'm taking some liberties with the strict definition of "conspiracy". Give the underlying parallel a little thought, if you will, as the point is more about the foundation than the silly building I've put on it. How would you
that either side is wrong?
"Those religious twits are working together, I tell ya. They peddle invisible fairies and silly stories and the only support they've got is 'cuz they say so'. After all, who wrote those books anyway? Convenient that you're the sole source of the only evidence you've got. I think it's really about money and prestige. Convince the sheep and they'll follow you anywhere."
"Those scientific twits are working together, I tell ya. They peddle invisible particles and silly theories and the only support they've got is 'cuz they say so'. After all, who built those machines anyway? Convenient that they're the sole source of the only evidence they've got. I think it's really about money and prestige. Convince the sheep and they'll follow you anywhere."
Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: Afraid to hope / / Detroit Red Wings: Another rollercoaster season?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dteowner
Find More Posts by dteowner