Falling For Fallout: A (Post-Nuclear RPG) Retrospective
View Single Post
December 10th, 2006, 18:11
To be honest, I quite dislike it. First, the form: I don't see why every paragraph needs to have a tittle, and I feel this takes away from the article - it appears too "bunched up". And secondly, the actual content: I don't see an actual
anywhere - loads of stuff are mentioned passingly, but, for example, gameplay is missed completely. On the other hand, there's a full paragraph on the SPECIAL system, which is not of big importance in the bigger picture. In total, the whole article seems a bit… weak.
Of course, maybe we simply don't agree on what a retrospective article is, so please, do not take offense.
Join Date: Oct 2006
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VPeric
Find More Posts by VPeric