View Single Post


October 18th, 2007, 22:37
Originally Posted by dteowner View Post
That might a bit of over-simplification, Mike. Taking out Saddam (even if you totally throw out the WMD fiasco) had more benefit to the world than just a big middle finger from Dubya and Daddy Bush.
Whatever the outcome, the lead-in doesn't show the same clear line of unavoidable conflict that the others do - and that should always be the burden of responsibility of proof for a leader.

— Mike
txa1265 is offline


txa1265's Avatar


Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Corning, NY USA
Posts: 11,632