View Single Post

Default 

November 28th, 2007, 18:43
Originally Posted by BillSeurer View Post
Whether to review a patched (and them which patch?) or unpatched version of a game is a controversy in and of itself. I think that reviewers should review what is actually released. If the company releases a buggy, incomplete mess they deserve a bad review. Maybe it would get companies to do a little more QA before release.
Arguably, but if the review is released a month after the game's release, it's fairly ridiculous to present the player with an unpatched version, unless you have a grudge against the company. It's simply not relevant anymore to the user, since the game has been patched for weeks.
Brother None is offline

Brother None

Brother None's Avatar
SasqWatch

#60

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,554