I would vote for Ron Paul. He is so different from most other republicans. He was great on the Bill Maher show on May 26th. You can find that full episode on YouTube if you're interested in seeing it(though you can also find small clips of it that leave out important parts). The thing I did not like though, is Ben Affleck was one of the guests, and he said that Mitt Romney will beat Ron Paul and get the republican nomination. Even Bill Maher himself who hates Bush and usually hates other republicans seems to genuinely like Ron Paul. He would be great to move the republican party back in a positive direction, instead of the disastrous direction Bush has been pushing the republican party. Bush and Paul may both be republicans, but they disagree on so much, its hard to believe they are both in the same party. There really is somewhat of a republican rebellion going on lately with Bush's strong and incomprehensible support for the senate bill entitled S. 1348(unfortunately Obama and Hilary both seem to basically support most aspects of it, and McCain is fully in favor of it and they have poor records in supporting legislation that would stop ilelgal immigration so for that reason alone I could not vote for them), telling people it does not include amnesty, and the lame security provisions in it that would not secure our borders to further illegal immigration. The last amnesty bill we had in 1986 under president Reagan was very similar to the S. 1348 bill, and that was a failure and only caused illegal immigration to increase. For the record, I have no problem with legal immigration in reasonable and racially balanced numbers(and our legal and illegal immigration is not racially balanced at all, but has been massively favoring hispanics over all other races for the past several decades, see this link for more info
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4703307
but I'm against illegal immigration. Conservative journalists, talk show hosts and t.v. show hosts have been really slamming Bush on this(and other politicians who support it) and for good reason. Most polls taken in the U.S. show that both democrat and republican U.S. citizens feel there is already too much immigration and it needs to be lowered, and much more could be done to secure our borders to prevent illegal immigration and most also want a law passed to make english the official language of the U.S. The citizenship clause of the 14th amendment is being abused like never before and it was never intended to give automatic citizenship to children of illegal aliens(but the courts have been wrongly interpreting it that way for a long time now), and one of the authors of the amendment even said as much on the floor of the senate back in the 1800's. We need to get the citizenship clause of the 14th amendment back to its original meaning and that woul help alot with discouraging future illegal immigration and Ron Paul would do that if elected. We need a president as well as senators and representatives who will carry out the will of the people and not ignore them. The only 3 candidates who are really serious about stopping illegal immigration without granting amnesty to all the illegals who are here are Paul, Tancredo and Hunter. Check out this link for more info
http://www.betterimmigration.com/
You might ask, well if not amnesty, then what should be done with all the illegal aliens currently in the U.S.? Attrition through enforcement. If we finally get serious about enforcing immigration laws(instead of just making token efforts to enforce immigration laws like every president post-Eisenhower)such as preventing employers from illegaly employing illegal aliens and reserving welfare benefits for only those in the country legally, most illegal aliens would eventually leave the country over time on their own and then go to the back of the line and apply to legally immigrate instead of trying to get in illegally again. The few who don't could eventually be deported.
Some say the main reason Bush is doing this is because he is a globalist like his father who thinks a one world government(governments across the world combining until there is eventually only one big government left)is what we should be aiming for in the future, and thats why he is quietly and stealthily setting the stage for the future formation of a North American Union(Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party has been making light of this in Canada and speaking out about it, and in the U.S. Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo have come out against it, but no other presidential candidates that I know of have spoken out against the idea), whether American citizens like it or not.
