|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Games » Indie RPG » Tactica: Maiden of Faith » Choices & Consequences or Game Length? which is most important?

View Poll Results - What is most important? replayability or game length?

Replayability! 4 22.22%
Game length! 12 66.67%
Other, please write below. 2 11.11%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Default Choices & Consequences or Game Length? which is most important?

January 7th, 2010, 10:21
I am thinking of what to be the main focus. As already stated this game has a lot of C&C but each time you add a choice with real consequence your developemnt time is multiplied by 2 ( Assuming the two paths are completely different ).

I am wondering which people think is most important replayability and C&C or game length? Almost every game I know of except Japanese games focus on game length.
Last edited by GothicGothicness; January 7th, 2010 at 15:12.
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#1

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,025

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 14:12
It's very rare that I replay games, so gimme an epic.

Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: *sigh* / / Detroit Red Wings: Took injuries to see them, but how about them youngsters!
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#2

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 11,198

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 14:33
What is "C&C" ? I only know "Command & Conquer".

“ Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.“ (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
Alrik Fassbauer is offline

Alrik Fassbauer

Alrik Fassbauer's Avatar
TL;DR

#3

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 15,630

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 15:01
Originally Posted by Alrik Fassbauer View Post
What is "C&C" ? I only know "Command & Conquer".
me too but I think it means choices & consequences.

To me, it's game length. Whenever I play games with choices, I keep thinking "I'll replay this as a xxxxxx to see what other endings there are" but then I never end up doing it. New games keep coming and I never ever play the games twice.
The only thing that would make me play a game again is if actual gameplay (and not just story) changes from one to the next. For example, if playing the 'good side' I have units/spells/abilities that are fundamentally different than if I play the 'evil side', so it could be considered as a different game. But if it's only story, I usually just play it once and then read or watch in youtube the other endings.
wolfing is offline

wolfing

wolfing's Avatar
Wonders what SasqWatch is

#4

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,853

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 15:14
But maybe the reason that games are so seldom replayed is that it makes so little difference? Ussually as you said wolfing all you might get is a different ending.. which you could watch on youtube. But a game like deus ex acctually makes quite some difference depending on what you do.

But what if a lot of events / story parts / battles / characters etc was different? in that case maybe the replay would be much more interesting ?

What is "C&C" ? I only know "Command & Conquer".
Oooops I thought this was a well-known concept. I stand corrected I updated the title to write Choices and Consequences. I guess the pool is slighty flawed as a game such as the witcher might be fun because of the C&C even if you only play it through ones………….. but it is not possible to updates polls… o well.
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#5

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,025

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 15:28
I voted for replayability even though length is important as well. RPGs don't seem to be having the problem that shooters are in which you play the game for 2 days and it's over. I hate paying full price for a game that takes less than a weekend to finish. I don't care how cool the graphics are or how fast and furious the gameplay is.

So as long as RPGs stay over the 2 day mark then I'll vote for replayability every time.

Despite all my rage.
I'm still just a rat in a cage.
skavenhorde is offline

skavenhorde

skavenhorde's Avatar
Little BRO Rat
RPGWatch Team

#6

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 5,408

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 15:31
I would like to avoid both simply because there's no time for long games or replaying games.

Complexity, depth and experience is what I want.

Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. - John F Kennedy
An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind. - Mahatma Gandhi
The world is my country. To do good is my religion. My mind is my own church. This simple creed is all we need to enjoy peace on earth. - Thomas Paine
JemyM is offline

JemyM

JemyM's Avatar
Okay, now roll sanity.

#7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,018
Send a message via ICQ to JemyM Send a message via MSN to JemyM

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 15:58
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
But maybe the reason that games are so seldom replayed is that it makes so little difference? Ussually as you said wolfing all you might get is a different ending.. which you could watch on youtube. But a game like deus ex acctually makes quite some difference depending on what you do.

But what if a lot of events / story parts / battles / characters etc was different? in that case maybe the replay would be much more interesting ?
That approach will force you to choose an audience. As a complete-ist, I get very irate over games that force me into a complete replay in order to experience all the content. A side quest here or there is one thing, but exclusive branches in the main quest are hard to pull off. I think M&M7 might be the only game I've played that pulled it off and that was simply because the game was good enough that I was willing to replay it, which as I mentioned is very rare.

So you choose between depth/replay and satisfying a portion of your audience. Not saying either choice is "right", but you should be aware you're making it.

Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: *sigh* / / Detroit Red Wings: Took injuries to see them, but how about them youngsters!
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 11,198

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 16:25
Add me to game length being my favored criteria. I do play extremely long games over and over again though. Its games that focus on story and lots of talky, talky that don't get much play time from me. I want deep skills systems, good character creation, and a big world with lots to do. This doesn't surprise anybody though. All my favorite games (New World Computing's-Might and Magic series and Bethesda's epic games), are very long. I've logged over 400 hours playing Fallout 3 and over 1000 playing Oblivion. I've replayed Might and Magic 3 and 7 once a year/18months since their release.

'nut
crpgnut is offline

crpgnut

crpgnut's Avatar
Fantasy Novel Archmage
RPGWatch Donor

#9

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Posts: 3,412

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 19:30
Choices and consequences, but not necessarily so that I can replay it. I rarely replay games, but I appreciate choices/reactivity all along the way.

I don't really care about game length. Even the short RPGs are quite long enough for me, and the longer ones are sometimes too long.
Anderson is offline

Anderson

Anderson's Avatar
Consolized

#10

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: US
Posts: 884

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 19:49
Anderson, I love your reply when looking at your avatar pic. One of the longest games in history

'nut
crpgnut is offline

crpgnut

crpgnut's Avatar
Fantasy Novel Archmage
RPGWatch Donor

#11

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Posts: 3,412

Default 

January 7th, 2010, 21:27
I'm exactly with DTE on this one (don't have a heart attack).

I have yet to find an RPG campaign that was worth replaying on its own merits. There's just too much repetition. Just like I rarely reread a book (Tolkien being the exception).

I did replay DII on harder difficulty levels, but that was to further my character, not because the campaign was enthralling.
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!
RPGWatch Donor

#12

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 9,649

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 00:04
Originally Posted by crpgnut View Post
Anderson, I love your reply when looking at your avatar pic. One of the longest games in history
True. But Morrowind wasn't one of the games I was thinking about, when I said sometimes RPGs are too long. I loved every hour of it, all 150 or whatever it was. I was thinking of Dragon Age.
Anderson is offline

Anderson

Anderson's Avatar
Consolized

#13

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: US
Posts: 884

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 00:24
Really? How about those long hiking trips between quest givers and destinations with continuously respawning flying beasts? It became completely lovable once I created a flying ring that allowed me shortcut all that filler.

DA on the other hand, sigh….
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!
RPGWatch Donor

#14

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 9,649

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 03:22
Well, I might be blinded by nostalgia a little, but I can't remember ever feeling bored. I enjoyed the long treks. It was the first RPG I played, and I loved the open-world design. I had the map pinned to my wall, and I used to think about all the places I'd gone and had left to go.

Those Cliff Racers were annoying, though.
Anderson is offline

Anderson

Anderson's Avatar
Consolized

#15

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: US
Posts: 884

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 05:27
Originally Posted by dteowner View Post
As a complete-ist, I get very irate over games that force me into a complete replay in order to experience all the content. A side quest here or there is one thing, but exclusive branches in the main quest are hard to pull off.
What about The Witcher? That forced you to choose how the story unfolded and based on your choices you recieved a totally different branch of the story. That was pure gaming goodness if you ask me. An actual roleplaying game that lets me "roleplay" my character. With my next replay I'll choose differently than I did in my first game. It makes replaying it a little more worthwhile.

Despite all my rage.
I'm still just a rat in a cage.
Last edited by skavenhorde; January 8th, 2010 at 05:48.
skavenhorde is offline

skavenhorde

skavenhorde's Avatar
Little BRO Rat
RPGWatch Team

#16

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 5,408

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 09:11
What about The Witcher? That forced you to choose how the story unfolded and based on your choices you recieved a totally different branch of the story. That was pure gaming goodness if you ask me. An actual roleplaying game that lets me "roleplay" my character. With my next replay I'll choose differently than I did in my first game. It makes replaying it a little more worthwhile.
Acctually I would go so far as to say… if it doesn't have choices and consequences it is not really a roleplaying game. Just linar story telling with stats & battles.

Thought given the comments on this thread, I will definetely try to make it longer than I originally had planned.
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#17

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,025

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 17:19
A good example is old Sierra's Quest for Glory series. You could play as a mage, complete the game, then start over as a thief and it would be a completely different experience (different gameplay, different approach to puzzles, access to different areas) and then again as a fighter. It's one of the few games (RPG) I've replayed.
wolfing is offline

wolfing

wolfing's Avatar
Wonders what SasqWatch is

#18

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,853

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 17:33
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
Acctually I would go so far as to say… if it doesn't have choices and consequences it is not really a roleplaying game. Just linar story telling with stats & battles.
There's some truth to that, but we like to call it "old skool" or spreadsheet gaming. It's just a different approach to the genre.

Again, it comes back to understanding your target audience. If you want to sell to Wiz8 and MM7 fans, you're wasting your time with deep branching story because iz all about character development. If you want to sell to Gothic fans, atmosphere (the living world) is king and character development is relatively pointless. If you want to sell to Morrowind fans (and I'd recommend counselling if that's the case ) then you've got to build a good sandbox and everything else is totally pointless. If you want to sell to Witcher fans, your story has got to be complex and branching, but the gameplay can stink.

If you try to sell to all of those groups at the same time, you will fail. There's conflicting priorities between the things that must be great and the things that only have to be semi-functional. Decide what type of game your vision is, and then identify the sub-sub-subgroup of gamers that want it. Cater to those folks and accept that others will be unhappy. For example, if your vision is Morrowind Redux, you need to listen to Jaz and Sammy for advice and you should probably put me on ignore. They "get" that game and they understand what's important in a game like that. If your vision is Wiz9, I love you and I might have a few constructive thoughts to offer between washing your car and mowing your grass, but Jaz probably won't buy your game.

Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
Dallas Cowboys: *sigh* / / Detroit Red Wings: Took injuries to see them, but how about them youngsters!
dteowner is offline

dteowner

dteowner's Avatar
Shoegazer

#19

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 11,198

Default 

January 8th, 2010, 17:56
I am not making this game to sell as many copies as possible.

I want to make a really fun and innovative game. Since it is turn-based I am not expecting people who only like action-rpgs / morrowinds / oblivions to be interessed to play or buy it though.

But I think it will be interesting for anyone who like turn-based RPGs with lots of stats and numbers and those kinds of things, after all I think very few here will consider branching stories and choices a huge negative in such a game/ as long as the strategy and stats part is solid?

However I am asking the RPGWatch crowd a lot of questions, because I think each have a lot of experiance and valued opinions on how to make a really good and fun RPG, even the ones who love action RPGs.

A good example is old Sierra's Quest for Glory series. You could play as a mage, complete the game, then start over as a thief and it would be a completely different experience (different gameplay, different approach to puzzles, access to different areas) and then again as a fighter. It's one of the few games (RPG) I've replayed.
Excellent example, both story and gameplay was really different…. those games where kind of short though
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#20

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,025
RPGWatch Forums » Games » Indie RPG » Tactica: Maiden of Faith » Choices & Consequences or Game Length? which is most important?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:40.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch