|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » RPGWatch - New Poll

Default RPGWatch - New Poll

November 11th, 2012, 02:57
Yes, I know, the old poll was past it's use-by date long ago. So, a new poll.
Our news is dominated these days with crowdfunding campaigns - be it Kickstarter, Indiegogo or even independent efforts.

Do you see this as a new era, supporting indie and middle-tier developments without the burden of publishers - or do you want a finished product before you spend your hard-earned? Is there yet another perspective?

Hit up the poll and comments.
More information.
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,968

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 02:57
I'm supporting Project: Eternity, and I'm contemplating Wasteland 2 and (lol, yes) Grimoire. There are indie projects ttbomk run by one person or very small teams with goals in the ten thousands, which makes it seem like they're trying to profit from the surge of popularity crowd-funding seems to enjoy right now. But for those projects, I usually would only donate very small sums.

"In Grimwhoah, you can ride on turtles."
Sacred_Path is offline

Sacred_Path

Sacred_Path's Avatar
Basement Horror

#2

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,005

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 12:43
I am not understanding the meaning of
There are indie projects ttbomk run by one person or very small teams with goals in the ten thousands, which makes it seem like they're trying to profit from the surge of popularity crowd-funding seems to enjoy right now.
Is like the product does not cost nothing, entirely free aquired by ilegal means,they are just making profit for a product that will be free for majority of users.
Igor is offline

Igor

Igor's Avatar
Watchdog

#3

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 168

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 16:55
You cannot into English, by chance?
Sacred_Path is offline

Sacred_Path

Sacred_Path's Avatar
Basement Horror

#4

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,005

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 17:56
The only one I've ever done, or likely ever will: Project Eternity. And it's all about Obsidian and the people behind it. They're an established company with high-end RPG-pedigree folks producing. It's a "can't fail" project, so I threw $1k at it.

I can't think of another setup that would have me consider a second donation, but who knows…
ChaosTheory is offline

ChaosTheory

ChaosTheory's Avatar
SasqWatch

#5

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: People's Republic of Wisconsin
Posts: 593

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 19:13
For me: Banner saga, Wasteland 2, Project Eternity, Shadowrun, Legends of Eisenwald.

I didn't pledge much over the minimum on each (Project Eternity I pledged the most by far). My feeling is if 3 of 5 pan out, then I'm in a lot better place gaming-wise than I am right now… amidst the Mass Effects, Call of Dudies, etc
Falchor is offline

Falchor

Falchor's Avatar
Sentinel

#6

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern US
Posts: 267

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 22:00
80% of the games will suck

i dont like bioware games
turian is offline

turian

turian's Avatar
Sentinel

#7

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 284

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 23:05
The biggest enemy of crowdfunding is the crowd .

Gamers' expectations and -worse- sense of entitlement are the single biggest threat to crowdfunding.
And I'm not talking about you guys or (the majority of) us here but more of the peripheral "casual" crowd who got sucked into the hype by the media or who just hopped on the bandwagon to be trendy.
Those are the people expecting AAA+ games from the crowdfunding projects and the ones who will be sorely disappointed if they find out that limited budgets and limited development times will "only" result in A- or B+ games, especially as far as the production qualities are concerned (i.e. limited graphical and aural fidelity etc.).

It is anyone's guess how much of an impact expectations not met are going to have on future projects but unless my assumed premise is entirely wrong it is almost guaranteed that there will be a fairly major impact [… that may very well be compensated by new people being attracted to crowdfunding because a game exceeds more people's expectations than the opposite but how likely is that?… well, as I said… anyone's guess… I guess ].


With all of that said, I have personally contributed to PE and I'm sort of contemplating Roberts' space game but I'm undecided due to the MMO-ish nature of the game. It's turning me both off and then on in a way. Dunno… just can't make up my mind whether it is worthy of support.
Also, I'm this moral kind of asshole who finds it hard to justify donating to the development of a game when I've donated fuck all to anything else.
So I've sworn to myself to donate at least 2x the amount I spend on crowdfunding this year to some kind of charity by year's end and so I'm naturally a bit hesitant to pledge to another project due to the exponential effect on my charity donation .
Moriendor is offline

Moriendor

Moriendor's Avatar
Spielkind

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Schland
Posts: 1,985

Default 

November 11th, 2012, 23:51
Originally Posted by Moriendor View Post
It is anyone's guess how much of an impact expectations not met are going to have on future projects but unless my assumed premise is entirely wrong it is almost guaranteed that there will be a fairly major impact [… that may very well be compensated by new people being attracted to crowdfunding because a game exceeds more people's expectations than the opposite but how likely is that?… well, as I said… anyone's guess… I guess ].
Yes I agree about this and only thing that is worth is Metascore of Metacritic, that will affect Fallout 4 for sure.
Igor is offline

Igor

Igor's Avatar
Watchdog

#9

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 168

Default 

November 12th, 2012, 00:37
Originally Posted by Moriendor View Post
The biggest enemy of crowdfunding is the crowd .

Gamers' expectations and -worse- sense of entitlement are the single biggest threat to crowdfunding.
And I'm not talking about you guys or (the majority of) us here but more of the peripheral "casual" crowd who got sucked into the hype by the media or who just hopped on the bandwagon to be trendy.
Those are the people expecting AAA+ games from the crowdfunding projects and the ones who will be sorely disappointed if they find out that limited budgets and limited development times will "only" result in A- or B+ games, especially as far as the production qualities are concerned (i.e. limited graphical and aural fidelity etc.).

It is anyone's guess how much of an impact expectations not met are going to have on future projects but unless my assumed premise is entirely wrong it is almost guaranteed that there will be a fairly major impact [… that may very well be compensated by new people being attracted to crowdfunding because a game exceeds more people's expectations than the opposite but how likely is that?… well, as I said… anyone's guess… I guess ].
.
This is a really good point. Democracy may not be the best form of decision making. This is what David Crane tried to do with Jungle Adventure and, to a lesser degree, Shaker.

I think of organizations like Maple Leaf Entertainment which runs the Toronto Maple Leafs as a great example of dysfunction.

Developer of The Wizard's Grave Android game. Discussion Thread:
http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22520
Lucky Day is offline

Lucky Day

Lucky Day's Avatar
Daywatch

#10

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Uncanny Valley
Posts: 3,219

Default 

November 12th, 2012, 03:27
So I've sworn to myself to donate at least 2x the amount I spend on crowdfunding this year to some kind of charity by year's end and so I'm naturally a bit hesitant to pledge to another project due to the exponential effect on my charity donation .
I could've sworn my kickstaarts would've surpassed the donations I make at this one website. Turns out I have 17 Kickstarters, 11 of which are games, and 23 donations. Kickstarter is closing the gap fast, though…
Capt. Huggy Face is offline

Capt. Huggy Face

Capt. Huggy Face's Avatar
Magicky Utok

#11

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,084

Default 

November 12th, 2012, 05:04
I believe in crowd funding, but I don't ever give large sums of money like 1000. I believe in puting out small amounts to a lot of projects so say if I get a fail on investment it isn't a big deal. Does anyone really care if they lose 15?

If you don't stand behind your troops, feel free to stand in front.
rune_74 is offline

rune_74

SasqWatch

#12

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,097

Default 

November 12th, 2012, 13:04
I don't think the lower production values will have a "major impact" at all. Most crowdfunding projects have screenshots and other things to make it plain what the end result will be like in those terms.

Also, the nature of the model is such that casuals aren't required to make it work. Dedicated fanbases will be enough for the vast majority of these games.

No, I think the primary challenge for crowdfunding is that too many of them will end up not being what was promised - and won't be delivered on time. I think some developers will find that not having strict deadlines and publishers breathing down their necks will tend to extend development time more than they might be prepared for.

It doesn't take too many of the really interesting projects to fail before people start getting sceptical and stop supporting in general.

That's my main worry - and the reason I'm holding off my support. However, if it turns out that "most" of these games actually get released within a reasonable timeframe AND they turn out to be actual quality games - not just a bunch of partially implemented ideas - THEN I'll probably start supporting quite a few of them.

While I absolutely adore the contept - I have to say I don't have enough faith in modern developers to go with blind support.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#13

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 15,258

Default 

November 12th, 2012, 16:40
I'm following you there, DArt. I gave to Obsidian because they're an established developer who wants to try something new. I'm almost guaranteed that this particular game will come out because it would ruin several careers if it doesn't. I really think Josh Sawyer, Chris Avellone, Tim Cain, et al, want to stay employed after Eternity
crpgnut is offline

crpgnut

crpgnut's Avatar
Fantasy Novel Archmage
RPGWatch Donor

#14

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Posts: 3,975

Default 

November 13th, 2012, 00:35
Originally Posted by crpgnut View Post
I'm following you there, DArt. I gave to Obsidian because they're an established developer who wants to try something new. I'm almost guaranteed that this particular game will come out because it would ruin several careers if it doesn't. I really think Josh Sawyer, Chris Avellone, Tim Cain, et al, want to stay employed after Eternity
Massive exaggeration, perhaps? I doubt that their careers will be ruined at this point, but I think they are spending enough time and effort on this that they will most certainly want it to succeed. It could also lead to follow-on work, which is another motivator.
rjshae is offline

rjshae

Bob
RPGWatch Donor

#15

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,646

Default 

November 13th, 2012, 15:27
There is too much noise… Lots of lame efforts that best case look like school projects. The good ones are 1 in 10 best case and I find myself wasting time checking out the news items. I personally don't think the Watch should cover anything with a funding goal under $75k. Let the rest fight for attention in the indie forum.

"For Innos!"
ToddMcF2002 is offline

ToddMcF2002

ToddMcF2002's Avatar
SasqWatch

#16

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 2,232

Default 

November 13th, 2012, 18:00
For me crowdfunding is a completely new era for cRPG gaming. It opened the road for RPGs both good looking and hardcore at the same time. I have backed 14 projects so far and large part of my money that I reserve for gaming goes to crowdfunding projects. I know that I can’t play them immediately. But I’m more than happy, because I have something that I didn’t have one year ago: hope for the future of cRPGs

Before crowdfunding era, single player RPG making has divided into two separate ways. There’re big budgeted AAA titles that have action gameplay, shiny graphics and much cinematics. And indie RPGs with strong loyalty into the roots of RPGs, but lack of enough presentation, graphics etc. Middle sized RPG development has died at the beginning of 2000s. I’m a great fan of Infinity Engine games, Fallout 1-2, Arcanum, ToEE, Wizardry 8, Might &Magic 6-8. But as we all know well games in the veins of these games from big publishers are impossible. Indie developers can provide these game mechanics, but they are mostly failing at presentation.

Crowdfunding provided fresh blood for the market. And it has many advantages. With this system many independent companies like Obsidian, Inxile or Double Fine can make games that we hardcore gamers wanted, rather than publishers’ PR guys wanted. Many great developers of the past either work at big companies to earn money or completely abandoned game development. Now crowdfunding gives them a chance to return to the scene.

But there’re also disadvantages. In order to make a middle budgeted RPG game you have to collect 500.000-1.000.000 $. And to collect this money either you must be a somewhat famous developer or you have a popular license in your possession(even this isn’t enough in some cases). *It’s nearly impossible for a non-famous developer to succeed at collecting that amount of money. So many potential has been wasting.

"Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
Gokyabgu is offline

Gokyabgu

Gokyabgu's Avatar
Sentinel

#17

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sigil
Posts: 816

Default 

November 13th, 2012, 22:33
Originally Posted by ToddMcF2002 View Post
There is too much noise… Lots of lame efforts that best case look like school projects. The good ones are 1 in 10 best case and I find myself wasting time checking out the news items. I personally don't think the Watch should cover anything with a funding goal under $75k. Let the rest fight for attention in the indie forum.
Really? You don't think we should cover Antharion, for example? But we should cover Grimoire because he asked for a ridiculous amount?

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#18

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,968

Default 

November 13th, 2012, 23:46
I'm just looking for a workable filter. Not sure on Antharion. Looks decent if generic but I can't appreciate the goofy South Park inspired avatars or lack of animations. Environments look good though… Bottom line is I see the experienced rpg crowd funded developers making the RPGs we want. Filling the gap if you will. Many, but not all of the others just do not impress… maybe they need to bake in the indie forum until sufficient interest is generated before they are considered news worthy? Just an idea…

"For Innos!"
ToddMcF2002 is offline

ToddMcF2002

ToddMcF2002's Avatar
SasqWatch

#19

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 2,232

Default 

November 14th, 2012, 03:15
Originally Posted by ToddMcF2002 View Post
I'm just looking for a workable filter. Not sure on Antharion. Looks decent if generic but I can't appreciate the goofy South Park inspired avatars or lack of animations. Environments look good though… Bottom line is I see the experienced rpg crowd funded developers making the RPGs we want. Filling the gap if you will. Many, but not all of the others just do not impress… maybe they need to bake in the indie forum until sufficient interest is generated before they are considered news worthy? Just an idea…
Don't agree at all. So only give the big names news notice(generating backing) and let the indie ones fend for themselves. Seems very narrowminded.

If you don't stand behind your troops, feel free to stand in front.
rune_74 is offline

rune_74

SasqWatch

#20

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,097
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » RPGWatch - New Poll
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:51.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch