|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
Realms of Arkania - Retrospective Interview @ RPGCodex
November 15th, 2012, 22:24
A retrospective interview with Guido Henkel on Realms of Arkania and RPGs can be found at RPGCodex.
1. What's your definition of RPG and how did it evolve over the years?More information.
To me, there are a few factors that make up role-playing. First and foremost, I think, it should be an adventure, in the sense of that it creates an exciting world and story that pulls the player in on some kind of quest. Exploration is a big factor also, along with critical decision making, which leads to certain character developments. And then there is combat, of course. While not necessarily integral, I think combat is always fun and should be part of a good RPG.
The key, however, is that fun should always trump the mechanics. A game that is tedious is missing the point, I think. The game should captivate the player, entertain and challenge him in his actions and thinking.
With the graphic capabilities of today’s computers we have moved away from role-playing games where the imagination played a big part to something that resembles more of a movie experience. This has advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand you limit the player’s imagination, but at the same time you create something that is fascinatingly beautiful or exotic at the same time. Which one is preferable depends on how you look at it, I suppose.
—
Computer n. A machine which flawlessly performs the instructions it is given, no matter how flawed those instructions may be.
Computer n. A machine which flawlessly performs the instructions it is given, no matter how flawed those instructions may be.
November 15th, 2012, 22:24
—
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. - HL Mencken
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. - HL Mencken
November 16th, 2012, 02:15
The Kickstarter has been submited. Expect it early next week if all goes well.
TB combat is confirmed, in the classical sense - not some modern interpretation. Details only after playtesting them to make sure his ideas are actually fun. Should happen soon.
Apart from that it will be "traditional", not "old school". So it's not direct competition to PE or WL2.
Thorvalla will neither be a DSA game nor get close to DSA in any way. Guido wants to create a completely new ruleset.
TB combat is confirmed, in the classical sense - not some modern interpretation. Details only after playtesting them to make sure his ideas are actually fun. Should happen soon.
Apart from that it will be "traditional", not "old school". So it's not direct competition to PE or WL2.
Thorvalla will neither be a DSA game nor get close to DSA in any way. Guido wants to create a completely new ruleset.
November 16th, 2012, 02:35
We'll see if it's clever. 
Guido seems to have some new ideas for storytelling and certain game mechanics. Which sounds good to me, even more so because he has the BaK guy on board.
So expect TB combat, a party and full character creation for the hero. Beyond that some innovation will happen. Probably not much, but certainly *some* innovation on top of a tradional RPG.

Guido seems to have some new ideas for storytelling and certain game mechanics. Which sounds good to me, even more so because he has the BaK guy on board.
So expect TB combat, a party and full character creation for the hero. Beyond that some innovation will happen. Probably not much, but certainly *some* innovation on top of a tradional RPG.
November 16th, 2012, 02:45
He also seems to consider the removal of map travel in RoA 3 to be a mistake in retrospect, hopefully that means he plans to include an engaging iteration of it in this game
.
.
—
What you think about most, is what you become.
What you think about most, is what you become.
Last edited by DeepO; November 16th, 2012 at 02:57.
November 16th, 2012, 04:18
Who's the BaK(I assume that to mean Betrayal at Krondor, one of my all time favorite crpg's) guy on board?
November 16th, 2012, 05:21
November 16th, 2012, 13:58
Excellent interview! Thanks to the Kodex!
Guido Henkel: I have always felt that real-time combat in a party based game is not only unrealistic but also extremely limiting. The beauty of role-playing is that you let your imagination go wild and if you force the player to revert to reflexive hacking and slashing, you are, in a way, defeating the purpose of RPGs. I prefer to take my time, appraise a situation and make tactical decisions. This kind of approach takes time since you need to do this kind of situational analysis for each member of the party. Therefore, real-time combat was never an option we considered seriously.Amen! Couldn't agree more.
—
"It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue."
"It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue."
November 16th, 2012, 14:08
I agree with his comment except the part about real-time combat being "unrealistic". Is it supposed to be more realistic to be able to take as much time as you want in the middle of a fight?
Regardless, I vastly prefer turn-based or RTWP over real-time for any party-based RPG.
Regardless, I vastly prefer turn-based or RTWP over real-time for any party-based RPG.
November 16th, 2012, 14:53
I guess that real-time-Chess would be fun, then ?
(My usual argument.
)
(My usual argument.
)
—
“ Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.“ (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
“ Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.“ (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
November 16th, 2012, 14:55
November 16th, 2012, 21:05
Originally Posted by JDR13I'm guessing he means that you have one player who has to make real time decisions for an entire party of characters. Unrealistic isn't the first word I would use, but its not realistic either.
I agree with his comment except the part about real-time combat being "unrealistic". Is it supposed to be more realistic to be able to take as much time as you want in the middle of a fight?
Regardless, I vastly prefer turn-based or RTWP over real-time for any party-based RPG.
Sentinel
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:13.

