|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
J.J. Abrams will direct Star Wars: Episode VII :(
January 25th, 2013, 00:41
Apparently, J.J. Abrams, who previously said he wasn't interested, is going to be the director for Star Wars: Episode VII after all.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-…221511526.html
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/articl…xclusive-74596
Me thinks this is a HUGE mistake…
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-…221511526.html
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/articl…xclusive-74596
Me thinks this is a HUGE mistake…
January 25th, 2013, 01:02
Originally Posted by JDR13For once I agree. Both the screen writer and director are a mistake.
Apparently, J.J. Abrams, who previously said he wasn't interested, is going to be the director for Star Wars: Episode VII after all.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-…221511526.html
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/articl…xclusive-74596
Me thinks this is a HUGE mistake…
Time will tell though.
—
"You know if my grammar and punctuation bother you tough luck. No one cares but you."
"You know if my grammar and punctuation bother you tough luck. No one cares but you."
January 25th, 2013, 01:19
What's wrong with JJ Abrams? He's a great director. Star Trek was very well done and Into Darkness looks great. We need more Star Wars like a hole in the head but that's another topic. Plus Lucas was dragging the universe into the abyss.
—
"For Innos!"
"For Innos!"
Bob
January 25th, 2013, 04:09
Star Trek was a good action flick but the problem with ST movies is they are too long in between - 6 TOS movies < 72 tv shows whose purpose was to be a backdrop for serious Science Fiction stories. Of course, the only good TNG movie was First Contact which could have won the oscar for best screenplay. The reboot is going to suffer the same problems.
I hope Abrams goes back to the roots of Star Wars - no not the "first trilogy" - the thing that made the first movie great in 1977: it was a tribute to the movie serials of the 1940's (So was Indiana Jones). That's the real reason it was titled #4; not because there were any sequels or prequels planned. He should stylize it after the Flash Gordon clones - like they did in STVoyager - and not on the pervailing Star Wars lore.
Or if he doesn't, he should at least make Kevin Anderson a screenwriter and a consultant.
I hope Abrams goes back to the roots of Star Wars - no not the "first trilogy" - the thing that made the first movie great in 1977: it was a tribute to the movie serials of the 1940's (So was Indiana Jones). That's the real reason it was titled #4; not because there were any sequels or prequels planned. He should stylize it after the Flash Gordon clones - like they did in STVoyager - and not on the pervailing Star Wars lore.
Or if he doesn't, he should at least make Kevin Anderson a screenwriter and a consultant.
—
"Your hat is stupid!" -Ice King
"Your hat is stupid!" -Ice King
January 25th, 2013, 04:20
Originally Posted by Couchpotato
For once I agree. Both the screen writer and director are a mistake..
Originally Posted by rjshaeIt's going to be a hell of a lot better than the last three movies, that's for sure. And I haven't seen Oblivion yet, but Michael Arndt did a solid job as a writer on Little Miss Sunshine, Brave and Toy Story 3, this guy is much better than Lucas, and J.J. Abrams is a better director.
I think they could have done a lot worse. Star Trek was excellent.
January 25th, 2013, 09:24
I am clearly out of touch with geekdom - I didn't even know a new episode was planned.
January 25th, 2013, 09:24
I consider this good news actually. I really liked his new Star Trek approach. I'm actually pretty excited about SW7 now.
Originally Posted by GhanBuriGhanDisney bought LucasArts a while back, and announced 3 new movies in the same process.
I am clearly out of touch with geekdom - I didn't even know a new episode was planned.
SasqWatch
January 25th, 2013, 10:14
Ehm ok.
Thanks for crushing all my hopes for a good SW entirely
Star Trek was a piece of shit - and the less said about LOST and JJ Abrams the better.
The man represents everything that's bad about modern Hollywood.
Thanks for crushing all my hopes for a good SW entirely

Star Trek was a piece of shit - and the less said about LOST and JJ Abrams the better.
The man represents everything that's bad about modern Hollywood.
January 25th, 2013, 11:25
January 25th, 2013, 12:55
o.O
All I remember about MiB was that ball that is too fast to catch, the guy in the guy's head and the guy who gets his head shot off all the time.
All I remember about MiB was that ball that is too fast to catch, the guy in the guy's head and the guy who gets his head shot off all the time.
January 25th, 2013, 16:07
Then again, there's a kind of symmetry to it all. He destroyed Star Trek - and now he'll destroy what's left of Star Wars. He's like the EA of movie directors
January 25th, 2013, 16:14
Originally Posted by DArtagnanAnd what were Insurrection, Nemesis and Undiscovered Country?
Star Trek was a piece of shit

Before the Abrams movie, the last good Star Trek was The Search for Spock. Voyage Home was not bad. The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek the Motion Picture were excellent. The others were crap IMO. Rick Berman was running the franchise into the ground.
January 25th, 2013, 16:19
Originally Posted by CountChoculaThe Undiscovered Country was one of the best Treks. I liked Insurrection - but Nemesis was awful.
And what were Insurrection, Nemesis and Undiscovered Country?![]()
Before the Abrams movie, the last good Star Trek was The Search for Spock. Voyage Home was not bad. The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek the Motion Picture were excellent. The others were crap IMO. Rick Berman was running the franchise into the ground.I disagree quite severely, but that's the way of subjective opinions.
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:58.


