|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Gothic 3 - Review @ GameZilla

Default Gothic 3 - Review @ GameZilla

December 11th, 2006, 20:47
The latest review of Gothic 3 is up at GameZilla. The rating is "Not Recommended", with the main complaint being combat:
Although the role playing elements work well and the story has plenty of potential, the action part of it is terrible. It’s bad enough to significantly reduce the desire to play all together. My primary compliant is attacking an enemy. Not only is it difficult to tell if you made contact, but the motion lacks any feel that you hit something solid. Other issues like repetitive side missions and the game crashing on occasion make it challenging to appreciate the world created and really dig in and explore it.
More information.
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,968

Default 

December 11th, 2006, 20:47
it is interesting that the majority of the revies rates this title average at best lately…
Garrett is offline

Garrett

Garrett's Avatar
Watchdog
RPGWatch Team

#2

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Germany
Posts: 133

Default 

December 11th, 2006, 21:36
Man, the game must be really bad. Why then I'm enjoying it so much? I may be strange being with desire to play terrible games…
Danicek is offline

Danicek

Danicek's Avatar
Sentinel

#3

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic
Posts: 418

Default 

December 11th, 2006, 22:21
I thought the guy nailed the combat system.

"For Innos!"
ToddMcF2002 is offline

ToddMcF2002

ToddMcF2002's Avatar
SasqWatch

#4

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 2,232

Default 

December 11th, 2006, 22:24
Mostly its because of the bugs and horrible performance and mostly people don't know they have to go to a tech support forum to find out tweaks to make the game playable.

We only do this becasue we are hardcore fans, I know this may come as a shock.

Jo"Whores Gothic"Wood, doomed Gothic 3 to this treatment instead of the AAA status it deserves.
I don't agree with many of the reviews it's hard not to try to put things in perspective.
Most people like the mass market causal gamers and moderate gamers have proabably never had to edit files.
Honestly I am not sure they should have to edit files, I do but I am a gamer.
Acleacius is offline

Acleacius

SasqWatch

#5

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,502

Default 

December 11th, 2006, 23:09
Originally Posted by Garrett View Post
it is interesting that the majority of the revies rates this title average at best lately…
Why is it interesting?

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#6

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,968

Default 

December 12th, 2006, 02:42
Picking up on the general content of members posts regarding G3 immersion and depth of gameplay etc' it looks to be the more the hard-core gamers that are less affected by the bugs and problems we read about, just as Acleacius and Danicek mention, the same goes for me.
I am so much immersed that i can barely leave the game alone, it is running beautifully, i am playing for hours on end because there is definately more depth of storyline than first thought.
This seems to suggest that some G3 reviewers (and some players) just don't get the picture, the game is supposed to be a long hard struggle for the protagonist, the redeemer, the decider to conclude against all odds and obtacles put in his way, to percieve the correct finely woven storyline path that is not very apparent to the average player. There are many not-so apparent hints dropped along the way - ignore them and the game becomes almost meaningless or boring and repetitive as some have mentioned.
It is so hard in places that ive had to double-back quite a few times because the true (dare i say) 'deceptive' storyline is almost hidden.

Now if reviewers are not aware of these G3 in game subtleties then they can hardly know just what they are reviewing in the first place and will perhaps have to play the game several times over (or make many saves) in order to understand the games intentions.

So regarding the reviewers quote….. ["Not only is it difficult to tell if you made contact, but the motion lacks any feel that you hit something solid"]
isn't quite exact. Combat as the levels increase become more definate and refined, at L65 i can hear a squash sounds of the sword striking, blood spatter and cries from opponents, sparks fly from skeletons blades when struck, bodies tumbling through the air as they die complete with sounds is not all that bad to me.
Wulf is offline

Wulf

Wulf's Avatar
Inquisitor

#7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North-West England
Posts: 1,107

Default 

December 12th, 2006, 02:43
I agree, we shouldn't HAVE to tweak files before we can play a game properly. That is something the devs should have been able to get correct, at least for the majority of players!!

If God said it, then that settles it!!

Editor@RPGWatch
Corwin is offline

Corwin

Corwin's Avatar
On The Razorblade of Life
RPGWatch Team

#8

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,570
Send a message via Skype™ to Corwin

Default 

December 12th, 2006, 10:37
Hm, I'm playing with acceptable performance with no crashes and with no ini tweaks on mid-higher setting with 3400+, 6800GS and 1024 RAM. I believe the performance is not that bad. They would have done better if they included some load screen instead of caching the world on the fly (which makes the game performance bit worse when (what I suppose is) higher volume of loading is done on the background).
Danicek is offline

Danicek

Danicek's Avatar
Sentinel

#9

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic
Posts: 418

Default 

December 12th, 2006, 16:14
Originally Posted by Danicek View Post
Hm, I'm playing with acceptable performance with no crashes and with no ini tweaks …
Even the buggiest, slowest game in existance will probably not crash and work OK on someone's system. But there really are a LOT of people having trouble when there shouldn't be any (or at least not many).

Gothic 3 was not ready for release and is suffering bad reviews because of it. Whether it will survive and become something respected like Fallout 2 (also horribly buggy at release) or go down in flames like Darklands (ditto) only time will tell.
BillSeurer is offline

BillSeurer

BillSeurer's Avatar
Eternal Supreme Dictator

#10

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,730

Default 

December 12th, 2006, 16:57
Originally Posted by BillSeurer View Post
Even the buggiest, slowest game in existance will probably not crash and work OK on someone's system. But there really are a LOT of people having trouble when there shouldn't be any (or at least not many).
Ok, you are probably right seeing so many negative comments about performance/crashes, there must be a lot of people affected.
Danicek is offline

Danicek

Danicek's Avatar
Sentinel

#11

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic
Posts: 418
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Gothic 3 - Review @ GameZilla
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:07.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch