Well, let's take a look, shall we?
1) where did the author ask for an explanation from the state? Oh, that's right, he didn't, because that wouldn't fit into his emotion-driven narrative. Balanced reporting? We don't need no stinkin balance when there's shock to be generated.
2) where is there any mention of "baby mill", any sort of sale, or anything even remotely hinting at such a system? Oh, that's right, there is no such implication in your own damn article. You just pulled it out of your ass to make the situation sound sinister and get people to read your drivel.
3) as has been pointed out more than once, you've pulled the same nonsense several times with whatever misleading bleeding heart story twangs your overactive heartstrings that day