Or perhaps it's just a case of the rule book being a bit contradictory? You've got the "man shall not lie with man" stuff and you've got the "love everyone" stuff. Could get a little tricky to resolve that tangle, even before you introduce the inevitable zealots. Perhaps you're just being a little too judgmental, hateful, intolerant, spiteful, and mean-spirited based on a very narrow litmus test of so-called political correctness?
Aside from agreeing with D'Artagnan ...
The probem is that the Old Testament was very much about history and living in that world ... and when people take things from that book, it is entirely about saying 'you cannot do this'. But specific to homosexuality it was taken from a highly contested context from a book that forbids all sorts of things including specific fabrics, getting tatoos, eating ham, and heck, children who curse their parents are to be put to death!
In the New Testament it is made clear that Jesus is saying things about 'The Way' - an enlightened path of conciliation and tolerance and acceptance. He surrounded himself with very flawed people and condemned those who claimed to be superior by seeking high positions in churches or adorning themselves with ostentatious shows of pseudo-piousness.
As for me, I believe that everyone deserves equal treatment, and that people of vulnerable disposition due to gender, religion, politcs, national origin or sexual orientation need to be defended from the 'tyranny of the majority'. Because 'privilege' is very real, and I know that as a white Christian hetero educated conservative-looking male I am afforded special treatment at nearly every turn - I have seen it time and again. I welcome all those who are accepting and tolerant, and hope that all others will seek to be more acepting. At my local RC church our first visit was not pleasant ... there was no 'greeting of visitors', and the homily was pretty much 'here is a list of types of people who are evil and wrong'.
I believe that people are entitled to their private opinions, and public opinions up to the point where no harm is done to others. I am all for healthy debate ... but 'right to exist' is not really a debatable point ...
And in the context of what the new Pope is doing - he is saying that Catholics need to focus more on being loving and caring and less on being intolerant of others. I have a good friend who is a devout RC, very anti-abortion and so on. But he takes action by working with at-risk and pregnant young people to try to help them choose alternatives, to get funding and support, and to be there for counsel throughout. And even if they choose abortion, he is part of a group to help them deal with the feelings from that as well. It is about love and acceptance of the people - even if they are opposed to the action.