I do know this: I have significantly greater difficulty in filtering out stimuli than most people. Anything that animates, changes color, changes shape, rearranges menus, slides, morphs, warps... Did everyone forget all of the mistakes of Kai's Goo? Does anyone even remember Kai? (googling doesn't count)
Yes, I do remember Kai's Power Tools or how they were called.
I found the GUI of them very, very creatively made up.
Last things I heard from him was that he wanted to assemble a team of creative people for a so-called "bit-Burg", kind of a castle (?) they wanted to rent here in Germany.
It was meant rather to be for experimenting than for "real" products, living out and testing of creativity, I'd say.
I do know this: I have significantly greater difficulty in filtering out stimuli than most people.
I have a similar problem, however, I've trained myself to quickly get into GUIs that are relatively intuitive to handle.
And when I say "intuitively", I really mean it so. I'm not thinking when I'm tryong out to perform tasks "intuitively", and I must say that I've got a talent for that.
I can quickly get myself into machines - how they work - with my mind, I don't know why or how this is there, but I can do it.
I assume that my intuition is well-trained, so to say, nut on the other hand some say that it is not the intuition that is trained, but rather the actual "listening" to it.
I don't care much about it, as long as it works. And I *can* quickly get myself into things ...
In my opinion, there are tqo sorts of OS shells: The logical ones and the intuitive ones. I don't think I've ever seen fully developed shells which combine both.
Logical shells are usually non-graphic shells, I think. Like the Linux Bash, for example (a few days ago I stumbled upon an letter to the editor in a Linux magazine that was referring to an article that was going like "Bash vs. GUI". To me, this was not necessary to develop such an article; to me, this was the tapping on each other's shoulders of a bunch of people who hate the GUIs of the world anyway - to me, it appears like an BMW driver writing an article on how much better his car is over let's say an Beetle).
Intuitive shells are usually GUIs. Seeing is believing, and as long as you can see things, you can quickly access them. Icons involved.
I like well-developed GUIs, and the iMac GUI I saw was the first one where I could believe this. (Another one that had impressed me was the OS/2 Workplace Shell for Windows 3.1 - a port by an IBM employee, apparingly).
The windows GUis are not well-developed in my eyes, although they imho do have some good points.
The Gnome and KDE (prior to 4) shells are in my eyes not very well developed, because they only act as graphical substitutes for the logic-driven non-graphical shell of Linux.