ChienAboyeur
SasqWatch
- Joined
- March 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265
The comparison was done relatively to some previous titles in the genre.I see your points though, don't get me wrong, the game doesn't have an 'end game', but the thing is, maybe that's why a lot of people like it. They don't play it 'to win', but to just build the city they want.
Previous titles, for some, also have no end game, no winning conditions. They had a way to instill a sense of purpose which is absent of CS.
As to building cities some players might want, no. Some players might want to build cities enjoyed by virtual citizens having different demands like living in a rural place, living in an urban place etc
At the moment, not possible.
That is the reason why telling that CS, at the moment, provides no sense of purpose is mandatory to inform people.Is that good or bad? It really depends on what you want from the game.
CS is growing for the sake of growing. It is a playground to powergame: think big, build big, grow etc
A video maker, specialized in the genre, excells at that exercize: Tom.IO. Should be worthwile watching his videos as it is going to be big, big and big.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 6,265