It is just a shame to let some of the great stories and epic games pass you by because of the lousy graphics. To me it is like saying that you prefer the new King Kong because the old one is in black & white.
I don't disagree with you in principle, but it isn't really as simple as it seems. A good friend of mine has struggled for years now to get me to play Fallout and Fallout 2. I've tried, but there's so much that I dislike that I haven't been able to be drawn in. I understand that these are beloved classics and, were they re-rendered in modern terms, might well be favorites of my own. However, they are turn-based games, I don't like turn based -- it breaks my immersion. I just want to play, I'll pause myself if I think it's necessary. FO / FO2 are 2D top down games. I don't like that view, I don't like controlling the character when it's moving toward me, I get confused. Graphics are nowhere near the quality that draws me in. All of these things
must be overcome before I can enjoy the games. I can't just ignore them because they directly effect my immersion and therefore my gaming experience.
So you see, to me, it's more than just a matter of color versus B&W. In King Kong there are many more factors at work. King Kong '33 isn't in color, true enough, but that's enough for some people. It's absolutely impossible to interest my cousin in a B&W film and she makes her judgement on that criteria alone. She isn't really missing anything by that decision, either, black and white ruins her ability to suspend disbelief. Shannon's world isn't black and white, she wasn't born in the b&w age, and a film without color is fake looking to her. That must be overcome before she can enjoy any film otherwise it's a struggle for her, it's how her eyes see the world.
Also, as is true with many films of the era, KK '33 is a product of it's time. The story explores the social concerns and trappings of post-depression era America and the messages presented belong to them. For this reason the original film
cannot resonate with a modern audience the way it did in it's own time and place. That's one the main reasons King Kong hasn't aged as well as some of the other classic Paramount horrors from the 1930s. The original also labors under the burden of being one of the first (if not
the first) big studio effects films. The film was absolutely packed with effects and they revolutionized fantasy film making in Hollywood (and, I'm sure, created the first anti-effects snobs
). Nowadays those effects are less believable and limit the ability modern audience see the magic.
I love all three versions of King Kong and my instinct is to agree that if people don't try to look past the limitations of the 1933 original, then they are missing a wonderful experience. However, many people can't just overlook these things, they must
overcome them which is very different and makes enjoying what you and I take for granted, a wonderful piece of history, a struggle.
It's like eating a pomegranate, they're delicious, but they're so much work that I start to ask myself if it's really worth it before I manage to get to the good part.