Looks like it's back to MahJongg..
They:
- demonstrated how online services can be ambiguous in term of "what do I own?".
For a long time here in Denmark, whenever a train was delayed it was announced over the speakers on the platform as "experiencing technical problems", no matter what the reason was. Over time the passengers got thoroughly fed up with the incompetence of DSB (national train services) and only then did they (the PR department at DSB) realize that not informing the passengers WHAT the nature of the problem actually was, was terrible PR.
Sure. But I get the people who are upset over this. A reputation of reliability is your most important asset in digital download, and as such this is just ugly.
Agreed. They can go screw themselves with an eggplant. I have no patience for this kind of crap. Then again, I'm the kind of person who will stop buying a product because the commercials piss me off.
To me that is a good reason to do business with them.
Fuck, I must be tired - but I really feel like doing something not-very-kind to people, to make them see how pathetic they're being in response to this.
Reputation. Reliability. Asset. This right here. That's what they're talking about. You sound like a manager type guy trying to win over some big investor. I understand that this is a business, but apparently they wanted to step away from that imago. Look at us! We're just gamers (good old gamers!) like you! It is true, of course, that back in the old days, companies used to pull more stunts like this. So it fits, I guess.
They're just making purchasing decisions. That's their call. You are aiming personal attacks at people because you disagree with their personal purchasing decisions. I don't think we need to get into who looks unreasonable in that scenario.
Yip, and in an ideal world I'd agree with you. But this is the real world, people care about their money. Their games were pulled temporarily for a marketing stunt. What bugs me about it is that rather than being fully contrite, GOG's attitude is "it was an opportunity we couldn't miss" and "stop being so serious". So where's the guarantee it won't happen again? That's what I mean when I say their reputation of reliability is their primary asset.
Running a company properly and intelligently doesn't necessarily equate to greed, etc. Usually companies that are going to be around for a long time need to be run by people who have some idea what they're doing…or, failing that, at least some common sense.
And yet you're whining about us whining.
And yet you're whining about us whining.