Um, no. This started because there was a declaration of the Bible as an absolute, verbatim, unerringly accurate and logical document without any form of fallacy or inconsistency. Which aside from being laughable, also subjects it to a different level of scrutiny and logical dissection.
What I am saying is that you CANNOT use the word 'blue' to describe the color of something in one sentence, then 'red' in the next sentence, and then a few chapters later call it 'green' … and then claim that there is no inconsistency - and still attempt to pretend there is logic or reason. That is what is happening - we KNOW the bible was handed down orally, and then went through many translations … we know that not nearly all original texts exist, we KNOW that there are widespread scholarly debates about the meanings of words or phrases, we know that there were things chosen to be excluded from the bible, and on and on.
Personally, I have had many people say to me that ' the bible is the best attempts of men inspired by God to capture his word … but being the product of men it is flawed in scope and delivery. The basic teachings of Jesus are an attempt to put The Way in simple form of being good to others without judgment … and that should be our focus'. And I would be fine with that.