Might have included «Mount and Blade» here but it's not enough polished yet.
Heh, that one is fun, especially with some mods.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2007
- Messages
- 162
Might have included «Mount and Blade» here but it's not enough polished yet.
6. Albion (I'm wishing for an exact remake of this one.)
If you read all eighteen pages, that's a pretty good effort yourself. Feel free to post your own list--this topic is ever green.
Welcome to the forums Dasale.
Senior member but very very young guy. I'm much more old than you but I disagree. That said, I haven't played ton of games from the early 90's and my point of view could be biased, at least despite I'm much older I'm probably not better placed than you to make a comparison between modern and old.I see this clearly now since I've started (As some of you may know) just recenlty getting into the games of early 90's. I genuinely think that these games are actually better and far more interesting than most of the stuff they release today. And there's no nostalgia factor here. I've never played this stuff before.
EDIT: HAH! This post made me a senior member. Seems fitting
Really don't play it without it's addon Night Of The Raven. This addon is a merge with the original game and adds a lot of density to it. It also setup a much better difficulty level, certainly a bit too high but ok anyway, plus it's an opportunity to discover the depth of the sword fighting system, and this merge avoid the too easy difficulty setup in Gothic 2 alone.I have yet to finish ... Gothic 2....
That's why I'm holding off on buying The Witcher. There's so much excitement about it that I'm expecting it to get better and better with time via patches, expansions, mods, etc. I'll probably have a new computer by then too, and that's another big advantage to playing games that are a little older.The problem is that once you have played Gothic 2 then play NOTR isn't the same because a strong part is merged with Gothic 2 and you lost most of the magic of discovery.
Certainly a wise decision, usually I always do that, sometimes not a clear decision but just because I didn't follow game news but it's clear it proved to be always good to start after many patches and eventually close to final patch.That's why I'm holding off on buying The Witcher. There's so much excitement about it that I'm expecting it to get better and better with time via patches, expansions, mods, etc. I'll probably have a new computer by then too, and that's another big advantage to playing games that are a little older.
Certainly a wise decision, usually I always do that, sometimes not a clear decision but just because I didn't follow game news but it's clear it proved to be always good to start after many patches and eventually close to final patch.
For me The Witcher current weakness after first patch aren't enough to not continue play it but it's clear that the best advice is to wait more, at least until 1.2 patch that pretends fixing important stuff like loading time and playability improvements.
I prefer to play the most stable and complete version of a game so I always wait for the final patch and all expansions before playing any computer game. I wait at least 6 months, as after that time a game has usually been patched enough and any upcoming expansions are at least announced at this point.