Homosexually is to be promoted to help combat over population.
But homosexuality is not a choice, right?
I don't think it is, or anyway it is not something that has MUCH choice. I don't think this would work and I don't think the medias are really doing this anyway. More like they are trying to split people with make believe made up issues so that no real political topics affect the elections.
War has changed, technology prevails and the need for mass infantry ground forces like the armies of old is far, far less.
As such, the old rules to get people breeding more soldiers have become mostly obsolete.
Most religions emphasize family because without that the religion dies out. They also emphasize peace because of the same reasons.
You'll find that the media has been doing its best to separate sex from reproduction in the minds of the commoners for quite some time now.
I think that's more to keep people working themselves to death to keep corporate profits up than any imagined philanthropy.
After all they can just import some third worlders to replace you.
So, update your old religious world-power brainwashing with a more modern "climate change" environmentally conscious perspective.
Do your part to save the planet and bang a dude today.
Climate change is just a scam to get more tax out of people. Any movement that has large amounts of astroturfing involved has something shady going on. Turns out the ice sheets are bigger than any time in history this year.
It's all just a scam to get corporate welfare tax breaks and even free money handouts. It's also a safe channel for environmental concerns that actually pads corporate profits instead of hampering them. If you mention GMO or endocrine disrupters or vaccines or fukushima then you are a conspiracy theorist, though.
Untold billions of dollars have been spent on computer simulations for predicting global warming. This is something that any computer scientist knows prima facie is provably impossible. Anything that involves observed values is simply not something that can be simulated. These simulations are just extrapolations and there is no science behind it. I could draw some lines on a piece of graph paper and it's just as (in)valid.
Of course now all the statistical models are proven false. Turns out sometimes the sun is more hotter than others, as has been claimed by many scientists all along. That being the case you can't really make any claims about the weather at all.
Anyone who'd engage in such nonsense let alone spend billions of gubmint money on it is an utter fraud.
Not to mention the obvious that we have been using fossil fuels for centuries and still no apparent warming. There's not that many more years we can use them before they are gone, anyway, and no way to stop their use easily yet, so not much point worrying.