Recommend me a book

Guilty as sin on the tangent thing, PJ, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find me getting snooty when I've asked for help.

Mike's in the good ol' US of A, so "house rules" apply, gents. It's that whole "know your audience" thing again, and just cuz England did it first doesn't mean us filthy American pig dogs can't change the rules of the language and then hold you to it. ;)

Actually, your first swipe was at Stephen R Donaldson before the Code ever got mentioned. And that's if we overlook the running squawk on Eddings.

Anyway, it looks like PJ got you a recommendation that met your standards, so I guess we can call the thread a success. Hope you find the book sufficiently stimulating.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
13,548
Location
Illinois, USA
Benedict said:
You've misquoted me a little there, if you're going to paraphrase someone please don't use quotation marks, they do tend to imply that you're quoting them verbatim.
Click to expand...

Wasn't trying to quote - jut citing a tactic. Thus the single rather than double quotes. Sorry to have implied otherwise.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
14,953
*clears throat*

Hum, I hope I won't get bitch slapped for recommending this :

Fantasy :

Weis and Hickman, like Titus proposed : Dragonlance Chronicles and Legends.
You don't need to read any of the other novels of that series.
Only these 6 will suffice.
And don't call Tracy a bloke again please. ;)

R. A. Salvatore (My personal favorite) : Everything with Drizzt Do'Urden.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
573
Location
Icewind Dale.
Benedict said:
Except for the Da Vinci Code, which really is utter shit, and if any of you liked it you should be ashamed. Particularly if you liked it enough to recommend it to some unsuspecting innocent.
Click to expand...


The Da Vinci Code is awesome!! It pwns everything else out there, and if you don't like it then you're stoopid!



Benedict said:
*Note for future reference - please don't take anything I write too seriously (including the last line above). Particularly if I'm ranting. Please do tell me if I am causing offence but please assume that I'm not setting out to do so.*
Click to expand...


Ditto
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
39,408
Location
Florida, US
I haven't read fantasy in ages, but as for non-fantasy, I'd like to recommend George MacDonald Fraser's 'Flashman' series... for the laughs and the historical innuendo, so to say. Then I'd like to recommend the only Star Wars novel of the last six years I liked: Karen Traviss' 'Republic Commando: Hard Contact' for the different angle on the SW universe it provides (the successor 'Triple Zero' wasn't as good, though). And finally, one of my favorite books of modern-day SF: Pat Cadigan's 'Mindplayers'. Remember the Jennifer Lopez film 'The Cage'? They borrowed heavily from 'Mindplayers', but you needn't be afraid: the book is generally entertaining and rather creepy while the movie had exactly one good scene.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
3,754
Jaz said:
. Remember the Jennifer Lopez film 'The Cage'? They borrowed heavily from 'Mindplayers', but you needn't be afraid: the book is generally entertaining and rather creepy while the movie had exactly one good scene.
Click to expand...


Did you mean 'The Cell'?
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
39,408
Location
Florida, US
Yep, that was it. Sheesh. Thanks, JDR.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
3,754
the cell was the only movie i have ever walked out on...uggh.

i've never read da vinci code or seen the movie, but didn't it borrow heavily from focault's pendulum?
 
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
812
Location
standing under everyone
Havent touched the daVinci code, but from the reviews I gather that there is a rather significant difference between it and Foucaults pendulum
Namely that the secret society in the daVinci code has a PLAN
. Foucaults pendulum is however a good but somewhat straining read.

But then I think the book it is based upon, and whose authors even sued Brown for plagiarism, is "Holy blood - holy grail". A hodgepodge of reasoning along the lines: "There is no sign of A, but then that makes sense since the secret society would work hard to conceal A, hence A is likely." Right next to "There are clear signs of B, hence B is likely". I did enjoy the take on Jesus family background, but otherwise it was a read that got increasingly ridiculous by the chapter.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
2,013
Zaleukos said:
Foucaults pendulum is however a good but somewhat straining read.
Click to expand...

I think Umberto Eco is being way too clever for his own good in that one. The Name of the Rose was great -- thoughtful, well written, unpretentious, with a lot of depth and detail to it in many ways. Foucault's Pendulum isn't anywhere near as good. "Full of air" is a phrase that occurs in it, and IMO it describes the book rather well. I liked even How To Travel With A Salmon better.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
8,540
dteowner said:
Guilty as sin on the tangent thing, PJ, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find me getting snooty when I've asked for help.

Mike's in the good ol' US of A, so "house rules" apply, gents. It's that whole "know your audience" thing again, and just cuz England did it first doesn't mean us filthy American pig dogs can't change the rules of the language and then hold you to it. ;)

Actually, your first swipe was at Stephen R Donaldson before the Code ever got mentioned. And that's if we overlook the running squawk on Eddings.

Anyway, it looks like PJ got you a recommendation that met your standards, so I guess we can call the thread a success. Hope you find the book sufficiently stimulating.
Click to expand...

Never! You colonials may go around mangling the queen's english but that doesn't mean those of us with some dignity should sink to your level.

I'd hardly call it a swipe anyway, I asked for recommendations and listed some authors I really liked and some I really didn't like. If you chose to interpret it is "Talk about books you like but if you like any of these then you're an idiot" then that's hardly my fault ;)
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,351
Location
London
Zaleukos said:
Havent touched the daVinci code, but from the reviews I gather that there is a rather significant difference between it and Foucaults pendulum
Namely that the secret society in the daVinci code has a PLAN
. Foucaults pendulum is however a good but somewhat straining read.

But then I think the book it is based upon, and whose authors even sued Brown for plagiarism, is "Holy blood - holy grail". A hodgepodge of reasoning along the lines: "There is no sign of A, but then that makes sense since the secret society would work hard to conceal A, hence A is likely." Right next to "There are clear signs of B, hence B is likely". I did enjoy the take on Jesus family background, but otherwise it was a read that got increasingly ridiculous by the chapter.
Click to expand...

If anyone quite likes the general subject matter as a foundation for a novel I'd highly recommend Robert Anton Wilson's Historical Illuminatus Chronicles (written I believe well before anyone wrote any of the others). An enjoyable read (at least if you leave all the footnotes alone). For those who've read Illuminatus this is much more of a standard novel.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,351
Location
London
Jaz said:
I haven't read fantasy in ages, but as for non-fantasy, I'd like to recommend George MacDonald Fraser's 'Flashman' series... for the laughs and the historical innuendo, so to say. .
Click to expand...

THey were good fun, amazing what kind of overt racism one could get away with then . . .
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,351
Location
London
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,351
Location
London
JDR13 said:
You obviously haven't seen 'Transformers' yet. :)
Click to expand...

If you go in with expectations high enough to muster the energy to walk out on it, that is ... I sure didn't ;)
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
14,953
JDR13 said:
Then you were obviously never a big Transformers fan as a kid, I was.
Click to expand...

What was the funny bit of see through red plastic you got with them for? Was that transformers?

And didn't they have some bit that if you touched it for long enough for your body heat to heat it up revealed the appropriate logo?

Man, I was easily pleased back in those days.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
2,351
Location
London
The toys\cartoons\comics were simply magic to me and my friends when we were kids.

Nostalgia is a powerful thing isn't it. :)
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
39,408
Location
Florida, US
JDR13 said:
Then you were obviously never a big Transformers fan as a kid, I was.
Click to expand...

No - that was well past my childhood ... 12" GI Joes with actual hair, 8-tracks, yeah, those were me ;) And my kids are too young for me to catch it on the flip-side - so this was pretty new for all of us, and so it was a meaningless, shallow, hole-filled action flick you forgot about before leaving the theater.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
14,953
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom