|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Favourite shooter/RPG?

Poll: Favourite shooter/RPG?

Poll Options
Favourite shooter/RPG?

Default Favourite shooter/RPG?

April 19th, 2010, 11:37
I disagree about DX - for me, it was a fantastic game and I can't see any relationship between it and the decline of the genre. It was a continuation of the work and concepts developed by Looking Glass, which started a long time before. And, as I ask in the newsbit: where are all the copy-cats? If DX started the decline of the genre, why are shooter/RPGs relatively rare?

As for separating and comparing specific elements (not the best shooter, not the best RPG) ignores the possibility the combination brings something unique. A good shooter/RPG takes the excitement of a shooter and adds welcome depth.

Finally, I knew the inclusion of some games (Vampire: Bloodlines) would be controversial but - trust me - if I'd left it out, someone would complain. And someone out there thinks Bloodlines isn't a genuine RPG and wastes the PnP ruleset potential with shooter mechanics.

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#41

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 12:16
DX was more a sidestep than an evolution from the Shock games.

Personally, I prefer the Shocks - but that's just that = personal preference.

DX was (and is) an utterly fantastic Stealth/Shooter/RPG and it has nothing to do with any kind of decline, from where I'm sitting.

Shock was more about immersion and tension - a variation of the Survival Horror genre, where DX was a sprawling stealth-based action game - with relatively strong adventure elements, though you could definitely shoot your way through. One key difference is the NPC interaction, of which there is none in the Shocks.

DX is more RPG to me than Shock, but it doesn't really matter.

Both are great.

As for most succesful hybrid? To me, that would be System Shock - but I consider the RPG elements to be EXTREMELY light. In that way, Shock 2 might be a more appropriate choice, and though it's not as good as the prequel, it's a fantastic game in its own right.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#42

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,047

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 12:28
Originally Posted by purpleblob View Post
Oh, I see. I haven't played NOLF2 and played NOLF1 a LOOOONG time ago. I honestly can't remember rpg element in 1st game tho. It was more spy/shooter game from my memory.
NOLF is a series which I along with STALKER , sims and UFO like to use to smash presumptions about what an RPG is to pieces. I wouldn't put NOLF2 in the RPG category either even if NOLF actually had dialogue choices too. Skilltrees, experiencepoints, dialogue choices… Still, it's not as free as I need a rpg to be. You still run a pretty much predetermined path like any fps. Still a fun game though, easilly as good as if not better than NOLF1.

Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. - John F Kennedy
An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind. - Mahatma Gandhi
The world is my country. To do good is my religion. My mind is my own church. This simple creed is all we need to enjoy peace on earth. - Thomas Paine
JemyM is offline

JemyM

JemyM's Avatar
Okay, now roll sanity.

#43

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,018
Send a message via ICQ to JemyM Send a message via MSN to JemyM

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 13:12
Where's System Shock?

= Big mistake

(Though RPG elements are minor)
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#44

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,047

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 13:57
Voted ME1/2, mainly because of the setting and the interesting use of powers (very Jedi-like).

Also, I generally prefer 3rd over 1st person view, which gives ME1/2 a small edge over certain games.
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#45

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,179
Send a message via MSN to Maylander

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 14:47
Druin,

I disagree about DX - for me, it was a fantastic game

That's fine. I'm not a fan of FPS games. I burned out on them with Unreal. Too shallow for me. They had some appeal for me back in the days when RPGs and Wargames were using mostly static graphics or at best crudely animated sprites, but there's nothing a shooter can do that I can't have in a better game genre. My opinion, of course

… and I can't see any relationship between it and the decline of the genre.

Maybe you weren't around the industry back then? Warren Spector was the second coming of Christ for a while there. And it was while a lot of the big PC game makers were getting bought out or failing, or both. The old ways of making RPGs got abandoned, and Deus Ex was hyped as at least one of the new ways. It had an impact.

By the way, the one game company that didn't abandon its recipe is Bethesda. I'm not a Bethesda fan and never have been, but recent RPGs have been so bad that Oblivion and Fallout 3 are actually amongst my favorite games in recent years. Which is pretty sad, since I was huge critic of every game Bethesda made from Arena to Morrowind.

It was a continuation of the work and concepts developed by Looking Glass, which started a long time before.


No, I don't think it was. I loved Ultima Underworld. I loved System Shock. I did not love Deus Ex. In fact, I couldn't even force myself to finish Deus Ex.

And, as I ask in the newsbit: where are all the copy-cats? If DX started the decline of the genre, why are shooter/RPGs relatively rare?


Because Deus Ex failed. It was over-hyped, and didn't meet expectations and surplus copies of the game were in the bargain bins in a matter of weeks. And that happened even though virtually every reviewer gave it a spectacular review… teh whole Second Coming and all that, don't you know

I think Warren Spector was the last of the industry's "Golden Boys" too! A lot of em crashed and burned in quick succession, for a while there. I can't really explain why so many bad games get good reviews, these days. Could be it's just a money thing, eh? But at least once in a while they give a score less than 90 for a major release.

As for separating and comparing specific elements (not the best shooter, not the best RPG) ignores the possibility the combination brings something unique. A good shooter/RPG takes the excitement of a shooter and adds welcome depth.


I agree. That has some appeal, for fans of shooters. It doesn't have much appeal for fans of RPGs, though

And I would still argue that it better be a good shooter at its core, and not a mediocre shooter with stats and dialog.

Finally, I knew the inclusion of some games (Vampire: Bloodlines) would be controversial but - trust me - if I'd left it out, someone would complain. And someone out there thinks Bloodlines isn't a genuine RPG and wastes the PnP ruleset potential with shooter mechanics.

Well, everyone has their own definition of "genuine RPG". What I object to is games that don't even make more than a token effort to include RPG elements being called RPGs.

By the way, I saw on Warren Spector's wiki that he was playing Ogre and GEV back in the late 1970s. I'm younger than him, but I was too! You know what those games were? A little fold out paper hex map with cardboard counters and about a 10 page mimeographed manual. You think that was the kind of game that the typical teenager or young adult was playing, back then? How did Warren Spector go from making games that interested him and that he would want to play, to making games that he thought he could sell a lot of copies of? Every game developer seems to make that mistake, and they never learn from it. It seems bizarre to me that people would try to use their creative talents in the pursuit of something that didn't even hold any interest for them, and think they'd come up with anything good that way.
CraigCWB is offline

CraigCWB

Sentinel

#46

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 485

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 15:02
I've been around for a while, so no, that has nothing to do with it. We have a very different perspective, such as the idea that DX might have been a failure. I recall DX being a critical success and, according to Wikipedia, it sold 1M copies - not too shabby at the time, primarily on one platform. I recall Spector becoming a celebrity because of the success of DX, not so much before.

Do you see the people lining up to agree with you? No? That doesn't make you wrong but perhaps it indicates that DX wasn't a bad game, but just didn't connect with you for some reason. As you point out, you already burned out on Unreal.

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#47

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 15:04
Originally Posted by CraigCWB View Post
Because Deus Ex failed. It was over-hyped, and didn't meet expectations and surplus copies of the game were in the bargain bins in a matter of weeks. And that happened even though virtually every reviewer gave it a spectacular review… teh whole Second Coming and all that, don't you know .

No, Deus Ex failed to *you*, and you seem to be the minority here. You also seem to have convinced yourself that what you're saying is actually true.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#48

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 16,931

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 15:24
I played Deus Ex a very long time ago so my memory may be failing me, but I sort of remember playing it as a shooter, much more similar to the way I play Mass Effect or even Bioshock, than the way I played Bloodlines which was much more an RPG to me.
wolfing is offline

wolfing

wolfing's Avatar
Wonders what SasqWatch is

#49

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,846

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 16:36
Originally Posted by CraigCWB View Post
Are you guys happy with the current state of affairs in the RPG genre?

That's a "yes" or "no" that I'm looking for. If you answered no, then Warren Spector and Deus Ex are (part) of what you should have a grievance about.
My answer is "no", but I'm mystified as to why you're pinning blame on Deus Ex after a decade of Diablo clones and MMORPGs. I wish Deus Ex had more - or even any - influence on RPG development. Sadly Deus Ex's gameplay didn't even influence its own sequel.

Originally Posted by CraigCWB View Post
… recent RPGs have been so bad that Oblivion [is] amongst my favorite games in recent years. Which is pretty sad …
Indeed. Sobering. Chilling actually.
Cassius is offline

Cassius

Watcher

#50

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 90

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 18:30
You know, if Fallout 3 made the list, Oblivion should. Same gameplay, but heck - you can even pause gameplay in F3 to use VATS constantly like I did. Oblivion was more fps to me than F3. ;-)

Not that I would've voted for Oblivion, for the level scaling alone.
irtehyar is offline

irtehyar

Traveler

#51

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 17

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 19:03
I disagree about DX - for me, it was a fantastic game and I can't see any relationship between it and the decline of the genre. It was a continuation of the work and concepts developed by Looking Glass, which started a long time before. And, as I ask in the newsbit: where are all the copy-cats? If DX started the decline of the genre, why are shooter/RPGs relatively rare?
I'm with you there, it had a massive influence on me. One of my favourite RPGs and a huge inspiration for Scars of War.

Indie game developer.

Dev Blog
Naked Ninja is offline

Naked Ninja

Naked Ninja's Avatar
Watchdog

#52

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 19:33
Originally Posted by irtehyar View Post
You know, if Fallout 3 made the list, Oblivion should. Same gameplay, but heck - you can even pause gameplay in F3 to use VATS constantly like I did. Oblivion was more fps to me than F3. ;-)

Not that I would've voted for Oblivion, for the level scaling alone.
Well, it misses the shooting part, unless you count 'shooting arrows'
WorstUsernameEver is offline

WorstUsernameEver

WorstUsernameEver's Avatar
Sentinel

#53

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 250

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 19:58
Deus Ex for me, although I haven't played the original System Shock (as well as NOFL 1 and 2). More games to add to the list.

System Shock 2 was great but was missing the story and NPC interaction branching of DE.
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!
RPGWatch Donor

#54

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 9,645

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 20:06
Originally Posted by JemyM View Post
NOLF is a series which I along with STALKER , sims and UFO like to use to smash presumptions about what an RPG is to pieces. I wouldn't put NOLF2 in the RPG category either even if NOLF actually had dialogue choices too. Skilltrees, experiencepoints, dialogue choices… Still, it's not as free as I need a rpg to be. You still run a pretty much predetermined path like any fps. Still a fun game though, easilly as good as if not better than NOLF1.
If having 'paths' is a requirement for you to name something an RPG then I guess almost no jRPGs should be named RPGs
wolfing is offline

wolfing

wolfing's Avatar
Wonders what SasqWatch is

#55

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,846

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 20:22
Neither should the Diablos by that measure. These are just lesser RPGs (in my view at least).
Thrasher is offline

Thrasher

Thrasher's Avatar
Wheeee!
RPGWatch Donor

#56

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 9,645

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 21:19
Fallout III babayyyyy

i dont think it's gonna win tho
Last edited by xSamhainx; April 19th, 2010 at 21:48.
xSamhainx is offline

xSamhainx

xSamhainx's Avatar
Paws of Doom

#57

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,527

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 21:44
Originally Posted by WorstUsernameEver View Post
Well, it misses the shooting part, unless you count 'shooting arrows'
… and spells! I do. It's shooting at things from a first person perspective. I think that pretty much sums it up.
irtehyar is offline

irtehyar

Traveler

#58

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 17

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 23:10
No, Deus Ex failed to *you*, and you seem to be the minority here.

Yes, I've noticed that. And it bugs me, since this is supposed to be an RPG site.

You also seem to have convinced yourself that what you're saying is actually true.

lol. Dude, I've been around a long time. I was arguing against the stupid mistakes of the game companies BEFORE they made them. I may not be "right", but the evidence in front of your face if you look at the current state of affairs in the RPG genre or in the PC game industry in general is pretty solid evidence I'm not wrong.

As to your "million copies" of Deus Ex, I'd like to see some stats on how many of those copies sold at full price, vs $19.99 (break even point) or $9.99 (we're bleeding money here!) but nobody ever makes such data public. I recall when Myst was the "best selling game ever". After 2 years of every PC vendor giving away a copy of the game with every new computer, and magazines including a free Myst CD with their subscriptions.
CraigCWB is offline

CraigCWB

Sentinel

#59

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 485

Default 

April 19th, 2010, 23:26
Originally Posted by Cassius View Post
My answer is "no", but I'm mystified as to why you're pinning blame on Deus Ex after a decade of Diablo clones and MMORPGs.
I'm actually not pinning blame on Dues Ex. It didn't have much influence, as you say. I'm pinning blame on Warren Spector. He was rocketed into the lime light out of nowhere and somehow became the master designer behind System Shock and Ultima Underworld, at a time when the "old breed" of master game designers were being dragged through the mud. He's the one who coined this "immersion" BS that we still hear so much about today, and he did that BEFORE DX was released (I disagree with Dhruin about the timing of it all).

That's far from the only problem in the industry, back then, though. You're right about the negative impact MMOs had on single player games. It's really pretty awful that a lot of young (and some not so young) designers seem to think the dull and repetitive gameplay of persistent world online games is a model to be copied in single player products. The only reason that works in online games is because they are social games lol.
CraigCWB is offline

CraigCWB

Sentinel

#60

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 485
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » Polls & Comments » Favourite shooter/RPG?
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:34.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch