|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Two Worlds II - Screens @ Worthplaying

Default Two Worlds II - Screens @ Worthplaying

May 25th, 2010, 01:47
Twenty screens from Two Worlds II can be found at Worthplaying.
More information.

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 01:47
I can't take any more press releases about TW2. They just need to release the game already.

If I'm right but there is no wife around to acknowledge it, am I still right?
TheMadGamer is offline

TheMadGamer

TheMadGamer's Avatar
SasqWatch

#2

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,852

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 02:39
I still need to finish the first game.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#3

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 16,933

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 04:53
Nice looking.
Anderson is offline

Anderson

Anderson's Avatar
Consolized

#4

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: US
Posts: 884

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 09:02
In all but one combat photo the camera is too low behind the PC , also displaying "UNDEAD" with a health bar right in the middle of the screen is a horrible idea .
Tragos is offline

Tragos

Tragos's Avatar
Otinanist

#5

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Athens (the original one)
Posts: 1,431

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 09:22
A game this pretty cannot and should not be played.

I like that RPG games these days is mostly about pretty worlds and how the all the interviews never actually have journalists asking the developers how their game is going to be different than the Hyped RPG #2342? Make a list, tell us how many features are unique in your game. Just like BioWare does with every.. oh wait.

Can't wait to play this.

ortucis

Guest

#6

Posts: n/a

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 09:36
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
I still need to finish the first game.
you wont miss anyting if you dont.

well…maybe if you do finish it, you can tell how poor done it was, and check out part 2 , looking for the stuff they made better.

i dont like bioware games
turian is offline

turian

turian's Avatar
Sentinel

#7

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 277

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 14:08
I still consider it better than Oblivion (but behind Gothic 3).
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,179
Send a message via MSN to Maylander

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 15:38
Originally Posted by TheMadGamer View Post
I can't take any more press releases about TW2. They just need to release the game already.
You've got around 4 months to wait then…
PrinceOfDeath is offline

PrinceOfDeath

Watchdog

#9

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 104

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 16:13
Two Worlds better than Oblivion?

Haha, ok then
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#10

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,048

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 16:39
I haven't finished Two World ONE! Played briefly some years back but then had to format my HDD and since then its untouched.

Those who have played it..can u tell me WHICH are the TWO worlds this game refers to? Is there some kind of magical parallel world (ala Oblivion realm)?
Last edited by Aditya; May 25th, 2010 at 16:52.
Aditya is offline

Aditya

Aditya's Avatar
Watcher

#11

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 87

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 18:11
Hmm, I don't remember anything like that. I suppose the second world could be the little dream nexus areas where the main character talks to his sister. I enjoyed Two Worlds, but it is so much less than Oblivion I can't believe anyone would seriously compare the two. Gothic 3, though I personally didn't finish, makes more sense in comparing to Oblivion.

TW was an Oblivion wannabe. TW2 probably will turn out to be an Oblivion wannabe also. The TW-devs sure brought up Oblivion a LOT in their discussions. Too bad TW never really could get their mod community going. If some English-1st folks could have edited the dialogue and wrote some good quests for the game, TW might be a good competitor with the big O.

Gothic 3 was just more polished overall than TW. All that said, I'm certainly looking forward to their second effort. It certainly was worth the money I paid for the game.

'nut
crpgnut is offline

crpgnut

crpgnut's Avatar
Fantasy Novel Archmage
RPGWatch Donor

#12

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Posts: 3,411

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 19:41
- It contained things I consider a huge plus though, such as factions the player had to choose between and locations worth exploring.
- The scenery was far more varied than that of Oblivion, with as much variety as Gothic 3 (desert, snowy hills, dense forests, even a samurai city).
- The main quest was as bad as that of Oblivion, so they're pretty much on par there.
- The combat system was more interesting, though it was poorly balanced initially. Among other things it had decent dual-wield
- 3rd person view did not look as if the character was sliding on ice across any surface.

I'll easily live with some silly conversations and a few technical glitches for such a list of pros. Gothic 3 trumps that though having the same list, but more interesting characters, locations and significantly better balancing (for everything but 1H + shield initially, which was very poor and lead to the infamous stun-lock situations). G3 also had fantastic atmosphere, and the best music track I've ever witnessed in a game.

I guess it's all down to priority, but I've never said anything other than G3, TW and then Ob as far as the three big sand box games go. I think I even mentioned it in my TW "review/preview" thing/thread back in the days.
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#13

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,179
Send a message via MSN to Maylander

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 21:59
Two Worlds was certainly better than sitting through Oblivion.

The part I found interesting was that Two World developers obviously loved Gothic enough to copy some art (like armors) and gameplay elements including little touches (which I can't be arsed to list).

The only problem was the incredibly stupid storyline and voice acting for main hero (my god, I CAN REMEMBER IT ALL). The combat on horse and combing similar items bit was fun little touches most RPG games don't have (esp. the horse combat, which every game with horses and enemies on foot should have).

ortucis

Guest

#14

Posts: n/a

Default 

May 25th, 2010, 23:04
None wants to comment on the UI ?
Am i the only one who finds it horrible?

To hell with G3 , easily worst than TES Arena
Tragos is offline

Tragos

Tragos's Avatar
Otinanist

#15

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Athens (the original one)
Posts: 1,431

Default 

May 26th, 2010, 00:31
Looking forward to this!!
Daroou is offline

Daroou

Sentinel

#16

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 307

Default 

May 26th, 2010, 00:54
I guess this is all a matter of personal preference but my experience is so different, I had to respond.

Originally Posted by Maylander View Post
- It contained things I consider a huge plus though, such as factions the player had to choose between and locations worth exploring.
I thought the exploration was terrible, because I found no interesting content anywhere. Awful quests, terrible writing. Can you give me an example of something you discovered that was worthwhile? I really tried - I discovered nice scenery but no interesting characters or scenarios.

- The scenery was far more varied than that of Oblivion, with as much variety as Gothic 3 (desert, snowy hills, dense forests, even a samurai city).
Agreed.

- The main quest was as bad as that of Oblivion, so they're pretty much on par there.
TW main quest (actually, all the quests I saw) reached new heights of awfulness - worse than Oblivion, which at least had less embarrassing writing and characterisation. But the main quest is such a small part, so why care about that compared to side quests? While they were linear quest lines, the Brotherhood and Grey Fox storylines in OB were excellent and the game was worth it for those two bits alone. What compares in TW?

- The combat system was more interesting, though it was poorly balanced initially. Among other things it had decent dual-wield
"Interesting" on paper, I agree. In practice, unbalanced, lacking weight, too clicky, even worse animations than OB.

- 3rd person view did not look as if the character was sliding on ice across any surface.
OK. Not a big deal to me.

G3 I loved - in spite of the problems - and I think is well ahead of TW.

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#17

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

May 26th, 2010, 09:29
Originally Posted by Dhruin View Post
I thought the exploration was terrible, because I found no interesting content anywhere. Awful quests, terrible writing. Can you give me an example of something you discovered that was worthwhile? I really tried - I discovered nice scenery but no interesting characters or scenarios.
I must admit I never found any specific loot while exploring (the majority of loot was scaled), but I certainly found remote settlements and what not (offering unique quests and so on). The rebel headquarter comes to mind - I stumbled upon it while exploring the forest region.

Originally Posted by Dhruin View Post
TW main quest (actually, all the quests I saw) reached new heights of awfulness - worse than Oblivion, which at least had less embarrassing writing and characterisation. But the main quest is such a small part, so why care about that compared to side quests? While they were linear quest lines, the Brotherhood and Grey Fox storylines in OB were excellent and the game was worth it for those two bits alone. What compares in TW?
The questline between the rebels and.. that other faction I can't recall the name of in the north. Not only do you have to pick sides, you get to explore camps such as the rebel headquarter, normally not available. Truth be told, the Brotherhood is a very good questline, but it's an exception, not the rule. Also, it's completely linear - could've used some choices, such as betraying/arresting the Brotherhood if you're a good guy.

Originally Posted by Dhruin View Post
"Interesting" on paper, I agree. In practice, unbalanced, lacking weight, too clicky, even worse animations than OB.
I simply don't agree, the animations in Oblivion look downright silly in 3rd person, mostly because of the way the character "slides" around. How good "combat animations" look in 1st person is irrelevant - it's just a weapon stabbing, I don't see how that can be done poorly. Is 1st person even possible in TW? I honestly can't remember, as I don't use 1st person unless I have to (i.e Might & Magic).

Also, calling any combat system "unbalanced" compared to Oblivion is a joke - Oblivion is one of very few games in the world where you get punished for having combat skills as your major skills. You'll do far better if you put some useless rubbish as main skills, so you can level up the combat skills without gaining levels. The more combat skills you gain as major skills, the weaker your character gets compared to the world around him/her.

Originally Posted by Dhruin View Post
G3 I loved - in spite of the problems - and I think is well ahead of TW.
No doubt.
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#18

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,179
Send a message via MSN to Maylander

Default 

May 26th, 2010, 09:30
I don't have much respect for Oblivion vanilla as a quality CRPG - but Two Worlds, while having some interesting ideas and amusing mechanics, was downright AWFUL in nearly every way that matters.

It looked clunky and everything that moved felt awkward. The dialogue was abysmal, and voice acting even worse than that. Absolutely nothing to inspire completing anything, and exploration was hollow and unrewarding. Dungeons were pointless, and I simply couldn't find a reason to do anything.

It was just a mess.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#19

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,048

Default 

May 26th, 2010, 09:39
Here's what I wrote on TW a few years ago. I haven't completed it more than a few times after this was written, so not much has changed. Quite a few things I don't recall about it to be honest.
http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1848
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#20

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,179
Send a message via MSN to Maylander
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Two Worlds II - Screens @ Worthplaying
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:07.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch