|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
Ultima IV - Remake from BioWare Mythic?
January 13th, 2011, 09:23
Just a short news for you guys : Browser is the next platform
Sentinel
January 13th, 2011, 09:41
Originally Posted by TwotricksFor some things perhaps, such as remakes/ports of older games and also for casual games, but I just can't see browsers being used exclusively for every PC game as a primary platform. (if I'm not mistaking what you mean by "Browser is the next platform.")
Just a short news for you guys : Browser is the next platform
January 13th, 2011, 10:12
Originally Posted by NerevarineThat's just a pile of crap. Anything can run "in" the browser, in the form of the plugin. For example - Quake live.
For some things perhaps, such as remakes/ports of older games and also for casual games, but I just can't see browsers being used exclusively for every PC game as a primary platform. (if I'm not mistaking what you mean by "Browser is the next platform.")
January 13th, 2011, 10:24
Well, there is also unity… but as of yet for example Unreal engine 3 games can't run in the browser.. so that is not true.
January 13th, 2011, 10:25
Just some news relating to browser games. Gamasutra has got an article on the future of 3d games using a browser. The fight is between Adobe and Unity. Haven't a clue as to what that means for Ultima, but there it is.
—
Despite all my rage.
I'm still just a rat in a cage.
Despite all my rage.
I'm still just a rat in a cage.
January 13th, 2011, 10:56
Originally Posted by NerevarineNo. Really - this is new target market. Browser unite all platforms , from mac,pc to phones and ipads. They all have it and use it.
For some things perhaps, such as remakes/ports of older games and also for casual games, but I just can't see browsers being used exclusively for every PC game as a primary platform. (if I'm not mistaking what you mean by "Browser is the next platform.")
I read that number of companies are working hard to make 3D drivers that work efficiently under web browser.
And rest is cakewalk.
Sentinel
January 13th, 2011, 11:00
January 13th, 2011, 11:54
Would like to see som pics.
Originally Posted by DArtagnanIts more exciting than the last ultima news that was the Lord of ultima -browser game. That was ultima in name only.
This is a cheap cash grab and people are excited?
—
"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."-unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke
"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."-unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke
January 13th, 2011, 13:07
Originally Posted by bemushroomedThere are alternatives, especially ones that don't require any plugin at all.
I doubt it. Doesn't most of these browser games require Flash? Flash doesnt work on Ipad, Iphone etc, i think the Flash support on Mac is quite bad too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_game#Technologies
I have had a look at The Settlers Online (in German) and that is for example a very good online browser game with aceptable garphics. Another example would be Quake Live.
A very big advantage of browser based games is that they should work no matter if you run Windows, Linux or Firefox, Opera, IE, etc. How this development continues remains to be seen but for now I think Browser Games have a future.
January 13th, 2011, 13:16
Originally Posted by pibburThat's because people forget that the game is so old that it will never be anything but one of two things:
I think it may have something to do with it being an U4 remake.
Looking forward to it.
1. Cute nostalgia.
2. Something entirely different, which can never - ever - be what the game was at release.
They do this kind of thing EXCLUSIVELY to profit from the name - to get a little sales boost. It's not like Ultima 4 is going to help bring casuals - so we're not talking big money.
Pure opportunism.
It's just a greedy little way of ensuring profit and investing minimally.
If only it was a design that would work with a modern treatment, like X-Com or Master of Magic - that would be one thing, but this is an archaic design that can never work with just updated visuals. So, they're obviously going to add some modern aspects to make it marketable. If people truly believe they're going to do something that takes the genre forward in a similar way, they're more naive than I thought.
Oh well. I hope I'm wrong
January 13th, 2011, 13:42
Originally Posted by RampantCoyoteExcellent? Perhaps, especially if you`ve never played them before. For me they`re best left in original form (and so is Ultima & others). Graphics were beautiful then - and are still, you just need to adjust your mindset a bit. It`s a bit like with vintage music or film…
There's precedent. Not from EA, but there's precedent:
Monkey Island.
The "remakes" were excellent. They were literally the same games, running on the same scripts, but with new graphics, sound, and voice-overs. And commentaries, even, from some of the original developers.
.
What annoys me the most are voiceovers - they`re hardly ever done right, and anyway, I liked to fill blanks with this lil` thing called imagination. Same goes for visuals…
Anyway, good luck/little hope is how I see this project. "Browser based"….yea, right.
Sentinel
January 13th, 2011, 13:55
@Dartagnan: I don't forget anything about the age of U4 and what we can expect, and I'm not naive, thank you.
I'd like to play it again in a modified version. If it strays too far from the original, I will be disappointed. We'll see. I have no illusions, but here and now I welcome the initiative, and I look forward to it.
I'd like to play it again in a modified version. If it strays too far from the original, I will be disappointed. We'll see. I have no illusions, but here and now I welcome the initiative, and I look forward to it.
Guest
January 13th, 2011, 13:59
Originally Posted by pibburLet's see when it's out - and then you can compare your excitement with reality.
@Dartagnan: I don't forget anything about the age of U4 and what we can expect, and I'm not naive, thank you.
I'd like to play it again in a modified version. If it strays too far from the original, I will be disappointed. We'll see. I have no illusions, but here and now I welcome the initiative, and I look forward to it.
Then let's talk about whether you're naive.
If the game lives up to your excitement, I'll go sit in a corner - and you can call me what you wish!

The deal of a lifetime!
January 13th, 2011, 14:24
Originally Posted by DArtagnanDon't you think it's a *little* early for you to start spitting your usual bile? Maybe we should wait until there are actual facts about the project on the table?
This is a cheap cash grab and people are excited?
They do this kind of thing EXCLUSIVELY to profit from the name - to get a little sales boost. It's not like Ultima 4 is going to help bring casuals - so we're not talking big money.
Pure opportunism.
If it even kicks off…I know you're a cynical bastard, and refuse to believe that devs *ever* do anything out of honest interest/passion, but isn't this maybe taking things a bit too far?
IMHO what you're saying doesn't make any sense at all. Why would a guy at Bioware pitch for such a small project to make small money - for the company! And why would Bioware need to do things like this, if money was their only interest? I think they can manage to make money on their own IPs.
Me, naive or not, I still believe that the guy honestly wants to remake the game. And have some ideas for how to make it really cool - if nothing else then in his own mind and eyes.
Sentinel
January 13th, 2011, 14:33
Originally Posted by KasperFauerbyHmm…
Don't you think it's a *little* early for you to start spitting your usual bile? Maybe we should wait until there are actual facts about the project on the table?If it even kicks off…
I know you're a cynical bastard, and refuse to believe that devs *ever* do anything out of honest interest/passion, but isn't this maybe taking things a bit too far?
IMHO what you're saying doesn't make any sense at all. Why would a guy at Bioware pitch for such a small project to make small money - for the company! And why would Bioware need to do things like this, if money was their only interest? I think they can manage to make money on their own IPs.
Me, naive or not, I still believe that the guy honestly wants to remake the game. And have some ideas for how to make it really cool - if nothing else then in his own mind and eyes.
If I felt you weren't a bit one-sided and extreme in terms of how you see my "cynicism" - I might believe in having a debate.
But you seem determined to see me in the worst possible light, and as such it won't help when trying to clarify my point of view - which isn't quite as cynical as you seem to think.
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:14.

