|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
The Witcher 2 - Preview @ PC Gamer
April 22nd, 2011, 03:59
Thrasher sends in this preview of The Witcher 2 at PC Gamer:
What stands out most about The Witcher 2 is – and believe me, it’s a rare big budget game that gives off this vibe – is that it feels like the game CD Projekt wanted to make, with neither apology nor compromise getting in the way of its vision. The engine targets high-end systems because that’s the only way to make it look this good. Characters happily drop words like ‘fuck’ and ‘cunt’ because it wouldn’t be The Witcher’s cynical world if they didn’t. Playing as Geralt doesn’t give you the same freedom of build and character as most other RPGs, because you’re not here to be a Paladin or a Mage, but a Witcher – a very specific mix of fighter, sorcerer and alchemist, with a steel sword for slaying humans, and a silver sword for monsters. Through the levelling system, you can tip the balance towards any of those disciplines, but you still need them all, because that’s how a Witcher rolls. Or makes heads roll, anyway.More information.
April 22nd, 2011, 03:59
Could i stir up more on this site than the few post i have made…
Well i am going to…
I have tats on my legs that i got back in 1990 on the ulitma games…
My personal feelings is the witcher will be the ulitma of the 80.s 90.s
Well i am going to…
I have tats on my legs that i got back in 1990 on the ulitma games…
My personal feelings is the witcher will be the ulitma of the 80.s 90.s
Watchdog
April 22nd, 2011, 04:13
Originally Posted by CelticFrostI ask on another thread what constitutes being a fan boy. Tats on your legs thanks for the answer.
Could i stir up more on this site than the few post i have made…
Well i am going to…
I have tats on my legs that i got back in 1990 on the ulitma games…
My personal feelings is the witcher will be the ulitma of the 80.s 90.s

Now that's hardcore role playing.
Keeper of the Watch
April 22nd, 2011, 04:55
A pretty positive preview. The one sentence that really stood out to me was…
"When battle rages, there’s no stopping to break out a medical kit or cast a healing spell. You win by being better and/or tougher than your enemies, or they crush you."
WIN!
"When battle rages, there’s no stopping to break out a medical kit or cast a healing spell. You win by being better and/or tougher than your enemies, or they crush you."
WIN!
April 22nd, 2011, 04:58
Originally Posted by SinI like this too - I definitely prefer a legitimate challenge where spamming health potions can't win the day. May 17th shall be epic
A pretty positive preview. The one sentence that really stood out to me was…
"When battle rages, there’s no stopping to break out a medical kit or cast a healing spell. You win by being better and/or tougher than your enemies, or they crush you."
.
April 22nd, 2011, 05:12
My new computer is being shipped today….
The Witcher Two is ordered…
My tats are in japanese The path of life follows truth, honor, valor, death
I am Canadian…
And lets hope witcher is the next greatest game……
The Witcher Two is ordered…
My tats are in japanese The path of life follows truth, honor, valor, death
I am Canadian…
And lets hope witcher is the next greatest game……
Watchdog
Sentinel
April 22nd, 2011, 05:58
The opinions of PCGamer isn't worth squat. Don't expect a good review score unless CD Projekt pay up like EA. Best summaried by their Dragon Age II review:
The best RPG combat ever. Not gaming’s best story, but maybe its best storytelling. Darker, sexier, better.
April 22nd, 2011, 06:06
The sad thing is, if Skyrim turns out to be another Oblivion, dumbed down console RPG, it will still be Game/RPG of the year, even if The Witcher 2 is better in everyway then Skyrim. The Wither 1 was better in every way then Oblivion.
April 22nd, 2011, 07:41
Originally Posted by hishadowYou can't lump all of PC Gamer into the same pile. That review was by Rich McCormick, who has always been terrible at reviewing RPGs. He gave Risen a 65 for example when even console mag extraordinaire Game Informer gave it an 85.
The opinions of PCGamer isn't worth squat. Don't expect a good review score unless CD Projekt pay up like EA. Best summaried by their Dragon Age II review:
I don't doubt he liked DA2 that much, because I know I disagree with him consistently. If they give the Witcher 2 review to Desslock, Stapleton, Cobbet or one of the rockpapershotgun guys though it should be good.
April 22nd, 2011, 07:47
Originally Posted by DoctorNarrativeIf that's the case, we gotta make a hit-list and put him on the top!
You can't lump all of PC Gamer into the same pile. That review was by Rich McCormick, who has always been terrible at reviewing RPGs. He gave Risen a 65 for example when even console mag extraordinaire Game Informer gave it an 85.
April 22nd, 2011, 08:01
Originally Posted by Eisbergthats a pretty interesting observation. I just don't see Skyrim flopping though. I feel that Witcher 2 will prove to be a great game as well, and it's also coming out at the perfect time. It will most likely see strong sales all the way up to November 11th, which is more than enough time for it to be a successful. I have plenty of room on my HD for both games!
The sad thing is, if Skyrim turns out to be another Oblivion, dumbed down console RPG, it will still be Game/RPG of the year, even if The Witcher 2 is better in everyway then Skyrim. The Wither 1 was better in every way then Oblivion.
Sentinel
April 22nd, 2011, 08:01
Originally Posted by hishadowIndeed. His Risen review didn't even make sense from what I remember, I wrote a long post about it on some forum at the time. It wasn't that negative, it just kind of described the game and then ended with a 65. I remember he mocked the fact that all the women in the game had "supermodel bodies."
If that's the case, we gotta make a hit-list and put him on the top!
April 22nd, 2011, 09:14
Originally Posted by EisbergNah. Oblivion was bad in many ways, but Witcher was lacking in more areas imo.
The Wither 1 was better in every way then Oblivion.
It didn't have the same level of exploration or interaction at all (in Oblivion every object in the world can be picked up and sold or used for example - try that in The Witcher, it's very static..), it didn't have any interesting loot or customization when it comes to armor or weapons, extremely limited when it comes to which kind of character you can play (there's just 1), can't swim/dive, can't climb/jump, combat was extremely bad (imo), doesnt come with an awesome and easy to use editor..
April 22nd, 2011, 09:31
Originally Posted by vurtI suppose this might lead to another "what makes an RPG?" debate, but several of those elements you mentioned really aren't a big deal for me personally, and as such, I don't feel that The Witcher is "missing out" or flawed for not having those aspects. I'll take an RPG built around a well-crafted story with a lot of intriguing choice and consequence over being able to pick up random game objects or go swimming any day
Nah. Oblivion was bad in many ways, but Witcher was lacking in more areas imo.
It didn't have the same level of exploration or interaction at all (in Oblivion every object in the world can be picked up and sold or used for example - try that in The Witcher, it's very static..), it didn't have any interesting loot or customization when it comes to armor or weapons, extremely limited when it comes to which kind of character you can play (there's just 1), can't swim/dive, can't climb/jump, combat was extremely bad (imo), doesnt come with an awesome and easy to use editor..
April 22nd, 2011, 10:58
Originally Posted by NerevarineIf it was just that then i'd agree with you, but there's a lot of other missing or just very lacking features in Witcher though. Imo customization, combat, exploration and loot is very important in a "true" RPG, hopefully it'll be a lot better in Witcher 2, they seemed to have listened.
I'll take an RPG built around a well-crafted story with a lot of intriguing choice and consequence over being able to pick up random game objects or go swimming any day![]()
..and that Witcher 1 was better than Oblivion in _every_ way is just not true. Better main story, characters, dialogue yeah. Personally i didn't care much for the quests themselves or the combat, i found that much, much better in Oblivion. Main story in Oblivion was awful but it had a lot of really nice and varied side quests.
Last edited by vurt; April 22nd, 2011 at 11:11.
April 22nd, 2011, 11:03
Are we now honestly comparing a open world RPG with a story and character driven one? Seriously? That's like saying the sports car is better than the pick up. Full stop. No qualifiers whatsoever.
April 22nd, 2011, 11:07
Originally Posted by Roi DantonYou're right. Makes me a bit irritated when people say story driven = must recieve GOTY, open-world with focus on exploring etc = dumb and deserves a low score.
Are we now honestly comparing a open world RPG with a story and character driven one? Seriously? That's like saying the sports car is better than the pick up. Full stop. No qualifiers whatsoever.
Will be interesting to see if Witcher 2 can join these two types of RPG's
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:15.

