|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
Deus Ex: Human Revolution - 94% in PC Gamer
July 30th, 2011, 12:05
VG247 reports Deus Ex: Human Revolution has scored 94% in the PC Gamer magazine issue on the way out to subscribers now. Of course, Invisible War got 92% but still…
More information.
More information.
July 30th, 2011, 12:39
Maybe if we subtract 90 out of these scores and consider the result as being out of 5 instead of 100 they will become more convincing?
BTW… Honestly what's the point of using a 100 points score in something so complicated as a computer game (and especially if you are not going to use the whole range)? A 5 star system sounds far more efficient to me: you can easily justify a one star difference but how on earth can you justify this 2 point difference?
BTW… Honestly what's the point of using a 100 points score in something so complicated as a computer game (and especially if you are not going to use the whole range)? A 5 star system sounds far more efficient to me: you can easily justify a one star difference but how on earth can you justify this 2 point difference?
—
"I am not interested in good; I am interested in new, even if this includes the possibility of it's being evil"
(LaMonte Young, 1962)
"I am not interested in good; I am interested in new, even if this includes the possibility of it's being evil"
(LaMonte Young, 1962)
July 30th, 2011, 13:59
That review is in PC Gamer UK and by Tom Francis (which is apparently their best reviewer). The cover is also a DX:HR cover.
SasqWatch
RPGWatch Donor
July 30th, 2011, 14:51
Originally Posted by azarhalHe gave Oblivion 95%, so I guess that means DX:HR is worse
That review is in PC Gamer UK and by Tom Francis (which is apparently their best reviewer). The cover is also a DX:HR cover.
July 30th, 2011, 15:24
July 30th, 2011, 15:45
Good to know it΄s as good as Dragon Age 2.
—
What you think about most, is what you become.
What you think about most, is what you become.
July 30th, 2011, 16:14
July 30th, 2011, 19:52
Numerical numbers at the end of reviews are 100% pointless.
Eager to read the review though. Tom Francis was a big Deus Ex fan if I recall correctly.
Eager to read the review though. Tom Francis was a big Deus Ex fan if I recall correctly.
July 30th, 2011, 19:55
Originally Posted by TheSiskoPC Gamer UK score (Tom's review) was 93% for Oblivion and the game average 9.4 on Metacritic. He actually found Oblivion a grind, the AI stupid and the background convo annoying…but he's a big Elder Scrolls fan.
He gave Oblivion 95%, so I guess that means DX:HR is worse![]()
Another review is out for DX:HR:
OXM (Official Xbox Magazine) gave 10/10, but they tend to give 10/10 a lot.
SasqWatch
RPGWatch Donor
July 30th, 2011, 21:11
Sounds promising. I don't trust magazine reviews any more though, I trust gamer opinions rather more.
But then we don't have that yet, so I'm cautiously optimistic for this.
But then we don't have that yet, so I'm cautiously optimistic for this.
August 1st, 2011, 09:59
Originally Posted by holerawGood point. Like in (almosty) any type of scoring, there is some uncertainty/variation - it's very unlikely that you use exactly the same scale from game to game, even if it's the same reviewer. Using a more finely graded scale than the amount of "natural" variation is also IMNSHO meaningless.
…
BTW… Honestly what's the point of using a 100 points score in something so complicated as a computer game (and especially if you are not going to use the whole range)? A 5 star system sounds far more efficient to me: you can easily justify a one star difference but how on earth can you justify this 2 point difference?
And of course: use the entire range. BTW, PC Gamer awarded "Plumbers don't wear ties" 3/100, AFAIR.
Me.
Guest
August 1st, 2011, 10:02
Personally, I don't get why people still care about these things. I mean, it's been incredibly evident for years now - that the entirety of gaming journalism is both corrupt and incompetent.
The best course of action, to my mind, is to completely ignore it.
The best course of action, to my mind, is to completely ignore it.
August 1st, 2011, 12:36
Originally Posted by DArtagnanI guess it's rather the inexperienced people who have no idea how to build up an own expertise.
Personally, I don't get why people still care about these things.
—
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
August 1st, 2011, 19:42
I'm only experienced with girls/women, not robots, androids, men or cyborgs
I am very much looking forward to DXHR though. I agree with Dhruin? who thinks we've seen the whole game already through trailers. Honestly, somebody should connect the 80 trailers for this game and see if they can build a complete game with them
I am very much looking forward to DXHR though. I agree with Dhruin? who thinks we've seen the whole game already through trailers. Honestly, somebody should connect the 80 trailers for this game and see if they can build a complete game with them
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:19.

