|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Games » General Non-RPG » Shooters and their Sequels

Default Shooters and their Sequels

November 7th, 2011, 05:29
Originally Posted by sakichop View Post
That's the exact opposite of how I feel shooters have greatly improved better ai, stories and more open worlds. Crysis, farcry 2 and rear being good examples.
Please tell me you didn't just name Farcry 2 as an example of a "good" shooter.

=EDIT: This thread is a child of the 'Rate Bioware Games' thread over in General RPG, so if you think it starts rather abruptly - you're right . - Tadaa!
Jaz=


*Edit* Lol.. why do I always get the blame for birthing a new thread? I didn't even start this conversation.
Last edited by JDR13; November 8th, 2011 at 06:59.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#1

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,478

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 05:51
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
Please tell me you didn't just name Farcry 2 as an example of a "good" shooter.
Yes I did. I enjoyed the environments and messing around with the fire physics.
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch

#2

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,119

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 06:06
Originally Posted by sakichop View Post
Yes I did. I enjoyed the environments and messing around with the fire physics.
Well I guess I'm glad someone out there actually enjoyed it. I thought it was one of the more disappointing shooter sequels I've played, but I was a big fan of the original Farcry.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#3

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,478

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 07:59
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
Well I guess I'm glad someone out there actually enjoyed it. I thought it was one of the more disappointing shooter sequels I've played, but I was a big fan of the original Farcry.
I never played the 1st one. Obviously you thought it was better. Why? What didn't you like about farcry 2? Maybe i'll have to pick up the first one after I take a spin through skyrim.
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch

#4

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,119

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 08:43
For me, the last really good FPS game was No One Lives Forever 2, and the last really good "pure" FPS game was Return to Castlewolfenstein. Since then they've come to rely on gimmicks rather than compelling gameplay and settings. Gameplay itself has gotten far sloppier (from controller driven development?), and being interrupted by cutscenes every 30 seconds doesn't help.

RPGs have a lot of the same problems, but I'm pretty sure we've covered how they're being merged into the generogenre at least once on this site.
Menigal is offline

Menigal

Menigal's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#5

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 769

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 17:57
Originally Posted by sakichop View Post
I never played the 1st one. Obviously you thought it was better. Why? What didn't you like about farcry 2? Maybe i'll have to pick up the first one after I take a spin through skyrim.
You've never played Farcry? You missed out on a classic. That would be like skipping Crysis to play (the vastly inferior) Crysis 2.

As far as what I didn't like about FC2, that would be pretty much everything. From the way buildings and enemies magically respawned, to the ridiculous diamonds for guns system.

@Menigal - You didn't like the Half-Life 2 games? I think those were probably the last story-based FPSs I really enjoyed. I really liked Serious Sam as a "pure shooter" though.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#6

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,478

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 18:34
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
@Menigal - You didn't like the Half-Life 2 games? I think those were probably the last story-based FPSs I really enjoyed. I really liked Serious Sam as a "pure shooter" though.
Eh, I didn't really get all the HL2 love, but I did get around to playing it a bit late. Maybe I'd been over-hyped by all the "greetest game evar!"-ness. It was alright, but nothing really amazing, and I got annoyed by the way it constantly switched playstyles. I always find it vaguely insulting when developers do that, like they think you're too stupid to keep playing otherwise. I suppose some of the casual-mainstream gamers (that is, the people who consider a 3 year old game a "classic", can't comprehend why anyone would want to play anything older, and wouldn't know what an indie game was if you gave them one) might need that sort of thing to hold their attention, though.

I forgot about Serious Sam, and Painkiller for that matter. I think mentally they occupy "arcade game" space for me, like a first person Contra or Smash TV.
Menigal is offline

Menigal

Menigal's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#7

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 769

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 19:01
Originally Posted by Menigal View Post
Eh, I didn't really get all the HL2 love.
Same here. This happened a lot to sequels of my favorite shooters.

I loved Half-Life, but for me HL2 was a serious letdown: It had neither the atmosphere nor the sheer size of HL. And while all this water-biking (you know what I mean) might have looked nice, it only served to break my immersion. Unreal, for example, had levels that were nothing more than tech demos, levels where you didn't do anything, but they still fit in nicely with the rest. For some reason or other, it didn't work with HL2 - even though it had Barney. Hmmm … thinking of it, I'd rather replay Blue Shift than HL2.

While I as a Wolf3D lover was very fond of RtCW for what it was, it was way too short for my taste.
Unreal 2: Well, they cut pretty much everything that would have made me love it. Besides, it was way too short.
Doom 3 was a neat game, but it was not Doom.
Heretic 2 was so different from the first Heretic that it was interesting to play, but still, it was rather short.
Blood 2 was too different and too difficult for my taste.

There were sequels of favorite shooters I really loved, however. Hexen 2, for example, managed to keep the difficulty level and playstyle of the first Hexen while the music added greatly to the atmosphere … and then there was Quake 4.
While Q4 was (of course) a tad too short and too linear, Q2 was so recognizable in its art style, atmosphere and story that it hurt.

Serious Sam was mindless fun, but it didn't suck me in like some other games did . Must have been the hilariousness. That also kept me from enjoying fan-favorite NLF too much.

Semper HiFi!
Motto of the 54th Groove Bde.
Jaz is offline

Jaz

Jaz's Avatar
SC-2201
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#8

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,322

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 19:39
Ah, Hexen and Heretic! My probably all-time favourite FPS…
I liked RtCW, Crysis 1, Half Life 1 and I find them quite enjoying, but to me they lack the atmosphere that these two gems (and sequels) have.
My hype will raise to the stars if one day ID announces the sequel of one of those…
Give us back the Serpent Riders!!!
Ball_Breaker is offline

Ball_Breaker

Ball_Breaker's Avatar
Sentinel

#9

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe's Boot
Posts: 341

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 19:45
Both Half-Life games rate pretty high for me, but I agree that HL1 was better for its time. I think HL2 has a great atmosphere though. It's different from HL1, but not in a bad way, imo. That reminds me…where the hell is Episode 3?

You gotta love Serious Sam for what it was though. Tiny European developer (Croteam had six employees when they made the original game!), almost no advertising whatsoever, and a $20 price at release. Yet it was better than a lot of AAA shooters.


Originally Posted by Jaz View Post
Blood 2 was too different and too difficult for my taste.
Blood 2 was a huge letdown compared to Blood. I tried playing it again earlier this year after getting a copy from GOG, but I only got about 1/3 finished before I lost interest. It just doesn't have the atmosphere and level design that made Blood so great.

Damn… we should start a separate thread.
Last edited by JDR13; November 7th, 2011 at 20:03.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#10

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,478

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 22:57
Personally I liked Far Cry 2, and I sincerely hate the first one, especially the Xbox version; probably my total disgust for auto saving in modern FPS starts from there…
At least in FC 2 there are checkpoints where you can save, a fair compromise by me;
also, I liked the setting and the much 'realistic' way it looks, plus the free roaming map.
Another game that I haven't liked at all is Crysis 2: it's pretty much inferior to its sequel imho, and I'm NOT counting the idiot auto saving function…
I feel too now a bit overrated HL 2, especially compared to the prequel, but indeed there is some atmosphere (the abandoned city level for example).
About Blood 2, JDR you've remembered me a game with the same engine, SHOGO: do you know it? It wasn't so bad at the time… Just my two cents.
Ball_Breaker is offline

Ball_Breaker

Ball_Breaker's Avatar
Sentinel

#11

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe's Boot
Posts: 341

Default 

November 7th, 2011, 23:26
Oh, I do remember Shogo (if that counts). Part beat'em up, part mecha game. Not quite my cup of tea, but an interesting mix nevertheless. Hubby loved it.

Semper HiFi!
Motto of the 54th Groove Bde.
Jaz is offline

Jaz

Jaz's Avatar
SC-2201
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#12

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,322

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 01:29
Originally Posted by Ball_Breaker View Post
Personally I liked Far Cry 2
Me too, it gets repetitive fast but it's the sort of game I like to dip into every now and then for an hour of mindless fun. But it was no Farcry1, and I wanted more of that.

What frustrates me with shooter sequels is the focus on cranking out a mega amazing new engine, as apposed to refining the previously successful gameplay. F.E.A.R comes to mind - the game play in the original is fantastic and everything a shooter should be - a tight mechanic with good level design. I wanted more of the same in the sequel but it was like playing a different game.

What's wrong with just adding a double barrel shotgun and a few new monsters then spending a couple of years on new levels? Go back to the future you developer jerks!
badmofo is offline

badmofo

badmofo's Avatar
Tired but happy

#13

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 364

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 02:01
Far Cry 2…. arg. Very pretty and kinda fun to drive through but the way things respawned as soon as you looked away was just plain dumb. That combined with the massive compression on voices killed the game for me. I quit after the first disk.

Half Life was great and Half Life 2 was pretty good, too. I decided to wait for the episodes to get finished and buy them all as one big package so I haven't played episode 1 or 2 yet.

The No One Lives Forever series was quite excellent (aside from one real long episode in Siberia). If it had been the first shooter I ever played, I'm sure I would consider it the best of all time. But it wasn't, so Doom is the best of all time.

Unfortunately, I haven't seen a real good FPS in a terribly long time. They all concentrate on the multiplayer thing now. Though the very first Call of Duty game had some moments. Particularly when you got tossed onto a beach with five bullets and no gun to put them in.
Zloth is offline

Zloth

Zloth's Avatar
I smell a… wumpus!?

#14

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,647

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 02:17
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
You've never played Farcry? You missed out on a classic. That would be like skipping Crysis to play (the vastly inferior) Crysis 2.

As far as what I didn't like about FC2, that would be pretty much everything. From the way buildings and enemies magically respawned, to the ridiculous diamonds for guns system.

@Menigal - You didn't like the Half-Life 2 games? I think those were probably the last story-based FPSs I really enjoyed. I really liked Serious Sam as a "pure shooter" though.
I guess I'll have to pick up the first then. I was mostly and still am I guess an rpg guy back then. I am finding myself getting more shooters now though. (more shooters than I used to anyway.) I will agree on the respawning had to stop driving because the patrols always respawned on the roads.

My first shooter was the original caste wolfenstein (not a fps though of course) I believe that was in the 80's. I enjoyed going around and holding up the ss. Then you blew up hitler at the end with a bomb. Oh crap sorry for the spoiler.
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch

#15

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,119

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 06:47
Oh, that Wolfenstein. If we're going back to non-first person plus voice samples, my first shooter would have been Berzerk. But as I played that at the arcades and not at home, it doesn't count.

Wolf3D made me buy my first computer, though I'd not consider it my favorite. Actually, I can't pick a favorite shooter as I enjoyed so many.

CoD felt way too scripted for my taste, and levels too linear.

Semper HiFi!
Motto of the 54th Groove Bde.
Jaz is offline

Jaz

Jaz's Avatar
SC-2201
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#16

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,322

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 06:51
Originally Posted by Ball_Breaker View Post
About Blood 2, JDR you've remembered me a game with the same engine, SHOGO: do you know it? It wasn't so bad at the time… Just my two cents.
I remember hearing good things about Shogo, but I've never played it myself. Maybe I'll grab it from GOG one of these days.


Originally Posted by Jaz View Post
CoD felt way too scripted for my taste, and levels too linear.
I loved the original CoD and its expansion, but it's been all downhill since then.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#17

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,478

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 11:48
Originally Posted by Jaz View Post
CoD felt way too scripted for my taste, and levels too linear.
The only CoD I've truly enjoyed was the First MW, because I've never played any of it (I don't like WWII setting, apart of Wolfenstein): but it was just the sense of something "new" which faded very quickly.
How about the First Nukem guys? Not Duke Nukem 3d of course…
Ball_Breaker is offline

Ball_Breaker

Ball_Breaker's Avatar
Sentinel

#18

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe's Boot
Posts: 341

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 12:13
I liked CoD for what they were, short and scripted, interactive movies. I liked STALKER as well for what they were. Different experiences.

Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind. - John F Kennedy
An eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind. - Mahatma Gandhi
The world is my country. To do good is my religion. My mind is my own church. This simple creed is all we need to enjoy peace on earth. - Thomas Paine
JemyM is offline

JemyM

JemyM's Avatar
Okay, now roll sanity.

#19

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,027
Send a message via ICQ to JemyM Send a message via MSN to JemyM

Default 

November 8th, 2011, 12:19
Originally Posted by JemyM View Post
I liked CoD for what they were, short and scripted, interactive movies. I liked STALKER as well for what they were. Different experiences.
Great game indeed, especially the first one.
Ball_Breaker is offline

Ball_Breaker

Ball_Breaker's Avatar
Sentinel

#20

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe's Boot
Posts: 341
RPGWatch Forums » Games » General Non-RPG » Shooters and their Sequels
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:15.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch