|
Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Game of Thrones - Reviews @ Eurogamer, Baltimore Sun

Default Game of Thrones - Reviews @ Eurogamer, Baltimore Sun

May 31st, 2012, 23:49
Here are a couple of reviews for Game of Thrones as the international release approaches next week.
First, Eurogamer has plenty of criticism but they acknowledge some positives on the way to a score of 6/10. Given they think the "turn-based" combat has "dated charm", fans of RTwP might have cause to get mildly excited:
Like the storytelling, gameplay is a slow burn. While it's almost criminal that the game wasn't designed from the start as an action role-player with graphic combat more akin to The Witcher 2 or Dark Souls, the turn-based battles carry a certain dated charm that grows on you. Selecting commands from your ability wheel slows time, adding a bit of strategic flavour when you choose how you want to strike. Unlocking new skill tree abilities helps, and given that you can control many of the partners that come and go from your party as the story dictates, it can be quite fun figuring out how to best use your party's skills later in the game, when larger, more chaotic melees become more common.
Outside of combat, BioWare-style choices affect how the story develops with some impact. An early example occurs when Alester, faced with famine and a crumbling economy in Riverspring, can either quell a civilian mob through violence or charity; choosing the latter earns popular support when you later face an invading army. This works with people's perceptions of you, too. But many choices are ambiguous, and there were more than a few cases when I thought I was picking the best answer for the situation only to have it blow up in my face.
…and from the Baltimore Sun, with more of this "turn-based" combat:
Combat is turn-based action, similar to the “Knights of the Old Republic” series. However, the pacing isn't quite right, and the player is often more of a bystander than a participant in melees. The game features an interesting slowdown feature to perform special moves in combat, but the effect is lost in the clunkiness of the combat and general interface.
More information.
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,968

Default 

May 31st, 2012, 23:49
Wow, I disagree with almost everything almost every review has to say. Maybe I should just stop reading them.
Capt. Huggy Face is offline

Capt. Huggy Face

Capt. Huggy Face's Avatar
Magicky Utok

#2

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,084

Default 

June 1st, 2012, 08:38
maybe these are still console reviews
I also disagree with them. Who knows how everybody plays the game.
I felt awkward many times with critically acclaimed titles.
borcanu is offline

borcanu

borcanu's Avatar
muist

#3

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ro
Posts: 772

Default 

June 1st, 2012, 12:46
6/10 and the reviewer called it "criminal" that the game lacks an action combat system. Pity devs always get hammered for not making button mashers. Wonder if Larian's Original Sin will get 4/10 for having "criminal" turn based combat…
Gaxkang is offline

Gaxkang

Sentinel

#4

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 344

Default 

June 1st, 2012, 13:01
These guys doesn't even know what "turn-based" implies. In their world, almost every single MMORPG are turn-based? What they mean is "round-based". And to call it criminal not to have a more action-based system? Damn, I think those crap reviews are criminal. I must be getting old who prefer slower paced tactical combat to higher paced action. Luckily for me on this site most people tend to agree…
tomasp3n is offline

tomasp3n

tomasp3n's Avatar
Watchamacallit?

#5

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 824

Default 

June 1st, 2012, 13:31
While it's almost criminal that the game wasn't designed from the start as an action role-player with graphic combat more akin to The Witcher 2 or Dark Souls,
To me this wording is a sign of how much spread the term "Action-RPG" actually is - at least in the minds of those who writes reviews.

Originally Posted by tomasp3n View Post
These guys doesn't even know what "turn-based" implies. In their world, almost every single MMORPG are turn-based? What they mean is "round-based".
Just as an example : In German language, the term "turn-based" doesn't exist as such; the actual German-language term is indeed "rundenbasiert". "Round-based", so to say.

The German language doesn't differ between both.

“ Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.“ (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
Alrik Fassbauer is offline

Alrik Fassbauer

Alrik Fassbauer's Avatar
TL;DR

#6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 16,057

Default 

June 1st, 2012, 14:26
Every time I play Game Of Thrones, I feel like the game should have a real turn-based combat (where each character attack one after the other) and not one where you have to pause all the time.
azarhal is offline

azarhal

SasqWatch
RPGWatch Donor

#7

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,712
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Game of Thrones - Reviews @ Eurogamer, Baltimore Sun
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:37.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch