|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Games » General Non-RPG » EA All-in on Microtransactions

Default EA All-in on Microtransactions

February 27th, 2013, 20:07
Well we saw what happened to Deadspace 3 with the micro transactions. Surprise apparently it was successful enough that every game from EA will them them now.

Remember there slogan "It's in the Game" apparently not. Thank you consumers from the bottom of my heart.

Electronic Arts during a Morgan Stanley Technology, Media, and Telecom Conference stating that the company is so pleased with its forays into the world of microtransactions, that they are bringing the support for these in-house, and that "all" their future games will feature microtransactions.

"We are building into all of our games the ability to pay for things along the way; to get to a higher level," said EA CFO Blake Jorgensen. "And consumers are enjoying and embracing that way of business."
Link-http://www.develop-online.net/news/4…tions-in-house

It's a depressing world if this is true and not just Business Speak. They will just become more and more pervasive with the popular "its just biz" excuse whenever someone criticizes it or suggests that its compromising creative design.

All I know is I'm kind of dreading what they have in store for the next Mirrors Edge, Dragon Age and Mass Effect games. Forced multiplayer, more DLC than actual game content (that day is coming) and so on.

"Dont like it, dont buy it" doesn't work if the industry can push itself to a large enough audience with marketing.

"We must stand strong my fellow watchers against the horde of red trolls."- The Couchpotato
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,478

Default 

February 27th, 2013, 20:18
No marketing will make me buy something I take as a fraud since the start.
No marketing made me to buy any DLC for DA2 rubbish nor I accepted their fraud model with ME3 DLC so called biowarepoints.

EA can search for cretins elsewhere. Meanwhile I'll happily toss hundreds on CDprojekt games and alike. Those things I can gift to ppl whithout making them feel moronic because there is some overexpensive DLC they should buy later.

Toka Koka
Last edited by joxer; February 27th, 2013 at 20:51.
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
RPGWatch Donor

#2

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,092

Default 

February 27th, 2013, 20:32
I don't think Dead Space 3 had much to do with this. I doubt microtransactions were very successful in that game. This has been in the works for some time.
JDR13 is offline

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#3

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,800

Default 

February 27th, 2013, 20:34
I haven't been buying a single EA title for years… as I've been boycotting them… glad to see I have been doing the right thing… they just get worse and worse… now EA please just don't buy and destroy anymore of my favourite game developer studioes!!
GothicGothicness is online now

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#4

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,210

Default 

February 27th, 2013, 21:48
Originally Posted by JDR13 View Post
I don't think Dead Space 3 had much to do with this. I doubt microtransactions were very successful in that game. This has been in the works for some time.
Yes it has and that's what worries me. I have no problem with it in F2P games as its necessary. Now it looks like it's going to be in every game we play.

EA and others always push the boundary to see what is acceptable. They take in account the money made off sales and balance it with the outrage of consumers. It's a game to see what they can do and see if people support it or it backfires.

People have shown they welcome the new direction so here we are. The outrage of a segment doesn't bother the profit. It was the same with DLC. Now look were we are.

Alright long rant over.

"We must stand strong my fellow watchers against the horde of red trolls."- The Couchpotato
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#5

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,478

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:05
Yup, I'll just continue avoiding EA products, both for myself and as gifts to others. It smacks of thievery the way some companies function these days, but then again the lemmings should know better.



-Carn
Carnifex is offline

Carnifex

SasqWatch

#6

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Posts: 1,617

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:22
EA isn't forcing you to buy anything. As long as they are not sacrificing the content in the game to do this I think it's a good thing.
Fluent is offline

Fluent

Fluent's Avatar
RPG Fiend
RPGWatch Team

#7

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,218

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:28
Its like, w/ DA i was forgiving, mainly because back then they had their PR bases covered, with what i felt were reasonable excuses. They still felt they had to defend DLC, and they did it well. Meanwhile, im an unrepentant DA fanboy, so i was willing to let them slide.

Now, they have no need to appease me with excuses - it's just the way it is from now on, take it or leave it! The honeymoon's over!

Thankfully, on one hand i have an impossible backlog of games. Secondly, theres enough creators out there NOT jumping on the dlc thing, that are probably as against it as everyone else. It just takes the entire industry in a really expensive direction
xSamhainx is offline

xSamhainx

xSamhainx's Avatar
Paws of Doom

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,664

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:29
Originally Posted by Fluent View Post
EA isn't forcing you to buy anything. As long as they are not sacrificing the content in the game to do this I think it's a good thing.
I knew you would. I recall the debates on how dlc is good for everyone. Come back to me in ten years then we will talk if adding micro transactions to every game is a good idea.

"We must stand strong my fellow watchers against the horde of red trolls."- The Couchpotato
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#9

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,478

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:46
I think in ten years I'll still probably be fine with DLC and in-game transactions . It gives the consumer more options, which is always a good thing.
Fluent is offline

Fluent

Fluent's Avatar
RPG Fiend
RPGWatch Team

#10

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,218

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 00:59
The debate whether they are actually "sacrificing content" is definitely up for debate, its one that's been flogged to death. I dont see what would stop someone from removing certain juicy things from a finished game, and charging for this now "extra" content.

It's true that expansions have been around forever, and that's essentially what dlc is, thats what theyll tell you. The difference being that expansions came at least a little while later after a game was released, it was additional content for people who liked the original game and wanted more. The day one dlc isnt that, in my opinion.
xSamhainx is offline

xSamhainx

xSamhainx's Avatar
Paws of Doom

#11

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,664

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 01:05
Originally Posted by Fluent View Post
I think in ten years I'll still probably be fine with DLC and in-game transactions . It gives the consumer more options, which is always a good thing.
Were beating a dead horse here. We will never compromise on this topic. That's fine though. Different viewpoints on topics make it interesting.

Part of me wonders though.We encouraged this. Cost of developing game goes up, willingness of gamers to pay full retail price for game goes down. Logical conclusion is that businesses must go outside the "retail box gets you everything" business model to make their balance sheets add up.

Short-sighted buyers would apparently rather pay for a $50 box and $50 more in DLC over a year than pay less than $100 up front and get everything. Go figure.

I should ponder on this more.

"We must stand strong my fellow watchers against the horde of red trolls."- The Couchpotato
Last edited by Couchpotato; February 28th, 2013 at 08:33.
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#12

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,478

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 01:07
They sink and sink in my personal reputation scale.

Perhaps SWTOR led them to think this as well ?

“ Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.“ (E.F.Schumacher, Economist, Source)
Alrik Fassbauer is online now

Alrik Fassbauer

Alrik Fassbauer's Avatar
TL;DR

#13

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 15,970

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 01:30
Considering how many games with potential are coming out in 2013 and 2014 both indie and smaller publishers I really don't give a crap what EA,Ubi, and Blizz are doing,they are not very likely to publish anything really good anyway.
Nameless one is offline

Nameless one

Nameless one's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#14

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,135

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 08:09
Pic needs re-posting.



It's not hard to imagine what the next picture would look like.

(Thanks Alrik for finding the image.)

"Mystery is important. To know everything, to know the whole truth, is dull. There is no magic in that. Magic is not knowing, magic is wondering about what and how and where." ~ Cortez, from The Longest Journey
Arhu is offline

Arhu

Arhu's Avatar
Feline Wizard
RPGWatch Team

#15

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,337

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 09:27
For the price, I buy. Gonna sell those pieces millions.

"And consumers are enjoying and embracing that way of business."
This guy says it as it is. Consumers have always been supportive of these initiatives. Starting with embracing to be charged with online distribution only model (Steam), that relies on the Internet for a service that it is not needed.

As soon as consumers show a desire to be charged extra costs for unneeded services, it is hard to see how a seller could deny this to their consumers.
It is nearly beyond business at this point.
ChienAboyeur is offline

ChienAboyeur

SasqWatch

#16

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,072

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 09:31
Originally Posted by Couchpotato View Post
Cost of developing game goes up, willingness of gamers to pay full retail price for game goes down. Logical conclusion is that businesses must go outside the "retail box gets you everything" business model to make their balance sheets add up.
:
Maybe.Maybe not. Fact is that players induced extra costs for unneeded things in their games. Players have shown a willingness to pay to developp things that are unnecessary in video gaming.

If players want to fund the securing of software for SP games through services like Steam (that adds nothing to SP games) maybe they want to fund other unneeded to them features.
ChienAboyeur is offline

ChienAboyeur

SasqWatch

#17

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,072

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 09:57
I hate this development. Luckily, most major RPG developers have not been eaten by EA yet.
Maylander is offline

Maylander

SasqWatch

#18

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bergen
Posts: 5,420
Send a message via MSN to Maylander

Default 

February 28th, 2013, 19:11
Well, it's no surprise EA are doing everything they can to destroy the future of everything they touch.

I despise microstransactions and how it affects the design process.
DArtagnan is offline

DArtagnan

DArtagnan's Avatar
Waste of potential

#19

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 14,399

Default 

March 2nd, 2013, 02:49
Originally Posted by Arhu View Post
Pic needs re-posting….
People keep going on like this is true but it just ain't. At least not with any game I've played. The game is full and functional without buying any DLC at all.

If you wanted that to be accurate, you would take the expansion off to the side and dice it up into half a dozen tiny pictures and put $10 price tags on each. And maybe a few tiny dots with a $5 cost (an extra gun, an extra hair style, allow your character to burp…).

The only game I can think of that got close to requiring DLC was Dragon Age: Origins with the keep that had the chest you could use for storage. I bought that, put a bunch of stuff into it, and never came back. The design of the game really didn't require that item at all.
Zloth is offline

Zloth

Zloth's Avatar
I smell a… wumpus!?

#20

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,735
RPGWatch Forums » Games » General Non-RPG » EA All-in on Microtransactions
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:10.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch