Your donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Games » Expeditions » Expeditions: Conquistador » Expeditions: Conquistador - Review @ CPUGAmer

Default Expeditions: Conquistador - Review @ CPUGAmer

July 8th, 2013, 12:57
A rather low score of 6 out of 10 for Expeditions: Conquistador was handed out by CPU Gamer, of which the reviewer also thinks that Kickstarter will never work for computer games.

Expeditions: Conquistador is a Kickstarter funded game. Kickstarter is a neat idea and I totally respect it as a way to fundraise, but I don’t think it will ever work for computer games. Blizzard got where it is today by releasing games “when they’re done”, but Kickstarter games are released on a tight schedule, and generally have to match what they said they were going to be in the Kickstarter campaign, with little room for improvement or refinements that would make a better game than what was advertised. The campaign in this case reached the $70,000 goal with a few bucks to spare, and they did release the game quickly. Props for that… past that, I wish they’d refined the game.
The summary of the game is brief.

There’s just barely enough here to make a passable game, but it’s a near thing, and only those who can handle the short-sightedness of the design will likely get the most out of it.
More information.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. Douglas Adams
Myrthos is offline


Myrthos's Avatar
Cave Canem
RPGWatch Team


Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,870


July 8th, 2013, 12:57
What tight schedule and whatnot is that guy talking about?

Expeditions on initial release had (a few annoyances aside) NO BUGS.
I'm the person who likes games when they have no bugs and I really don't care if those were made by Blizzard or not.

Passable design? Okay I guess ppl have different tastes. To me Expeditions is a great small gem and in fact a proof that Kickstarter can give out good games.
Toka Koka
joxer is offline


joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
RPGWatch Donor
Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor


Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,173


July 8th, 2013, 14:21
The world map camera does feel a bit constrained, I agree on that. But I consider that a relatively minor complaint. It seems this reviewer generally struggled with the rather slow pace of a turn-based game.
GhanBuriGhan is offline


GhanBuriGhan's Avatar
Wose extraordinaire
Original Sin Donor


Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,509


July 8th, 2013, 15:22
Everybody is entitled to their opinion. Lets assume that Expeditions is a 6/10 game. To now judge the whole Kickstarter concept on one game, is rather daft. Have this guy ever heard of Indie games? So if a game wasnt produced by blizzard or some other big corporation its not finished. I would say this game was Finished, period. If he doesnt like the game it doesnt mean its full of bugs or unfinished. And another thing for a game with a $70 000 budget and from an unknown developer I'm very impressed. I want to hear what this dude has to say when one of the big budget kickstarters (>$1million) from some of the more well known developers come rolling in. The industry really needs to get hold of people that know something about computer games to do reviews, not some guy thats cut his teeth on tablets and ipods.
Donkerman is offline




Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Africa
Posts: 62


July 8th, 2013, 15:31
Totally agree with joxter. I think the reviewer doesn't like TBS or maybe the game was too hard for him or whatever. And Kickstarer works well with computer games - that's a fact (or maybe this guy thinks that Wasteland 2 or Project Eternity is 6/10 game as well…. Anyway I like Expeditions: Conquistador it is unique in its design and execution and thumbs up for that!!
And BTW: if this reviewer thinks that Blizzard is the best - well think again - do you REALLY want to wait 10 years for a Diablo 3 or Starcraft 2? And in the meantime play nothing….?
xep624 is offline




Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 150


July 8th, 2013, 19:06
Ah here we go with the relative grading scale… 6/10 means (or at least it should mean if you're using the full scale) that it's a slightly above average game. I kind of agree. I enjoyed it, but all things considered it was an above average game to me.

"There’s just barely enough here to make a passable game" = this is a bit harsh, though.
ChaosTheory is offline


ChaosTheory's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch


Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: People's Republic of Wisconsin
Posts: 792


July 8th, 2013, 19:57
"Kickstarter games are released on a tight schedule"? Guy seems clueless. There's no real requirement to stick to your schedule. Not to mention, Banner Saga and Double Fine Adventure are both almost a year late already; and Blizzard didn't get where it is today by releasing crap like Diablo 3.
Stingray is offline


Original Sin 1 & 2 Donor


Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 585


July 9th, 2013, 02:04
I haves played it for a few hours and based on their budget I think they did a great job with this game.
Saxon1974 is offline


Saxon1974's Avatar


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 438


July 9th, 2013, 23:43
This guy will sure be embarrassed once these bigger KS games will start coming out. 10 years from now, this review will be posted by trolls whenever he pisses someone off.
The Walkin' Dude is offline

The Walkin' Dude

The Walkin' Dude's Avatar
Watcher of the Keep


Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 94
RPGWatch Forums » Games » Expeditions » Expeditions: Conquistador » Expeditions: Conquistador - Review @ CPUGAmer
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:52.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch