|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Dragon Age: Inquisition - Interview @ RPS

Default Dragon Age: Inquisition - Interview @ RPS

September 13th, 2013, 06:18
Rock, Paper, Shotgun has posted the second part of the interview with Laidlaw this time talking about race, romance, and how time works in the game.

RPS: You can choose your race and your sex again in this one. I assume that’ll have a pretty major impact on what you see and don’t see this time around? You previously noted that the year-long delay allowed you to make some pretty big changes on this front.

Laidlaw: To some degree. Our big goal is that there’s some sort of significant impact to making that choice. I don’t think I want to spend the entire game being called a knife-ear because I chose an elf, over and over again. At that point it just becomes background noise. But at least at one or two points in the game, I want it to rear up and say, “So you chose elf! Cool! Let’s deal with that.” That, to me, is a very intriguing element of the game and it always has been.

RPS: Yeah. It’s something that genres like fantasy or sci-fi are pretty well-equipped to discuss, because you can take a fairly sticky subject and abstract it and see the effects of it. There was a lot of stuff dealing with race in DA 2. Is that still a big theme, a big thread in the game?

Laidlaw: It always has been. Again, to some degree, you being an Inquisitor overrides some of the race stuff. But yeah, the elves are still considered lower-class citizens. The dwarves are still this kind of alien culture. And if you’re on the surface, by nature you’re an outcast from the real dwarven culture, as far as they’re concerned. They have this weird internal racism.

And then on top of that, Qunari bring in a really interesting new wrinkle, in that they’re kind of the barbarian invader race. They’re a highly advanced barbarian invader race from across the sea that everyone’s terrified of, because at one poine they tried to conquer the whole darn place. They fought to a standstill and they never really were pushed back at all. So suddenly one of them is Inquisitor. It poses some interesting challenges.

RPS: You’ve mentioned that romances are going to break outside the box of traditional “BioWare romances.” They’ve been described as more “event-based.” What does that mean? Do you reach this point in the game/romance and this thing happens, next point, this thing happens?

Laidlaw: No, no, I wouldn’t say so. It’s just attempting to get away from the idea of, “Oh, +10, and here’s a gift, +5.” Getting away from that kind of raw, mechanical, insert happiness event kind of stuff. So event-based is more just a general approach.
More information.
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,696

Default 

September 13th, 2013, 06:18
This guy's voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me, even when I'm reading it.
Capt. Huggy Face is offline

Capt. Huggy Face

Capt. Huggy Face's Avatar
Magicky Utok

#2

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,029

Default 

September 13th, 2013, 18:13
They always sound so head over heels in love with the political background they created. I'm sick of hearing about the mages vs. chantry, elves vs. humans, etc. Can't you make a damn game with a bunch of interesting adventures? Cool dungeons with traps, puzzles interesting monsters instead of another horde of darkspawn over and over?

Why does it alway go back to politics? Characters spouting exposition?
Ovenall is offline

Ovenall

Ovenall's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#3

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Downtown Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,038

Default 

September 13th, 2013, 19:30
Why does it alway[s] go back to politics? Characters spouting exposition?
Because it adds depth to the setting?
rjshae is offline

rjshae

Bob
RPGWatch Donor

#4

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,439

Default 

September 13th, 2013, 23:39
Laidlaw: No, no, I wouldn’t say so. It’s just attempting to get away from the idea of, “Oh, +10, and here’s a gift, +5.” Getting away from that kind of raw, mechanical, insert happiness event kind of stuff. So event-based is more just a general approach.
That makes me happy. If they can do it for all the party progression, and not just romance as the question mentioned, it would be great.
I really dislike dialog options with incentives attached to them. So if they can get rid of those I will be happy.
Foss is offline

Foss

Foss's Avatar
Watchdog

#5

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 198
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Dragon Age: Inquisition - Interview @ RPS
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:23.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch