|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - News Roundup

Default The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - News Roundup

June 10th, 2014, 09:16
I have more infomation to share about The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt as it seems ro be a busy week forCD PROJEKT RED. Up first I have the new E3 presentation from today.



Next I found a new video interview from E3 at Gametrailers.

CD Projeckt Red's Executive Producer stops by All Access to talk about The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Then I found a new article on Dual Shockers with a few twitter replies.

Following the reveal a few days ago CD Projekt RED is disseminating more information about the upcoming The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt through its official Twitter account.

We learn that the developer is “looking into” cross-platform save import, even if they can’t make any promise yet. It might prove rather relevant considering that The Witcher 2 was on PC and Xbox 360, while its sequel will be on PC, PS4 and Xbox One.

The developer also mentioned that we’ll get more gameplay footage “sooner than we expect,” which probably means that we’re going to see some at E3.

Finally, they also confirmed that horse racing, portrayed in the screenshot below, will be one of the minigames included in the game.
And for last I have five resons why you should buy the game from crashwiki.

With The Witcher 3 pre-order announced nearly a year before the game hits store shelves a lot of gamers are wondering if it’s worth it. While the first Witcher was innovative, and the second one amazing, what’s in store for the third? We’re taking a look at a few good reasons to buy, or not buy.
More information.
Couchpotato is offline

Couchpotato

Couchpotato's Avatar
LazyGamer
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Potato Land
Posts: 9,559

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 09:16
Well, the gameplay looks…. really good, hard to say without trying oneself though.
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#2

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,221

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 14:13
The blood puddles behave strangely for anyone else? Or is that just the video compression?
azarhal is offline

azarhal

SasqWatch
RPGWatch Donor

#3

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,514

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 14:40
Originally Posted by azarhal View Post
The blood puddles behave strangely for anyone else? Or is that just the video compression?
I think it's because of the fish-lens view that triggers when Geralt uses his senses. At least, that's what it looks like to me.
danutz_plusplus is offline

danutz_plusplus

danutz_plusplus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#4

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 15:56
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
Well, the gameplay looks…. really good, hard to say without trying oneself though.
Game looks like an updated TW2. I hope they can inject the charm of TW1 into it, which was missing from the sequel (for me).
srabuseen is offline

srabuseen

Watcher

#5

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 84

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 16:18
Out of curiousity what did you think was better in TW 1 compared to TW2 ?
GothicGothicness is offline

GothicGothicness

GothicGothicness's Avatar
SasqWatch

#6

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,221

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 16:57
Can I try to answer that?

Generally, if you love(d) NWN, you'll like TW1 more. If you hated NWN, you'll like TW2 more.
I hate NWN and thus generally I like TW2 more.
Yea, yea, now someone will come and say something to prove this wrong… I don't care and will not change my opinion on the Aurora matter.

However…
IMO TW1 had better music and collecting cards was fun. For TW2 devs decided to drop cards and insist on sometimes really annoying QTE. That was a bad design decision and definetly not charming!

For TW3 we already know (and is seen from gameplay vid) that there will be no QTE and the music is far better than TW2 one. Since it's openworld, comparing the engine to Aurora or the one used in TW2 is unnecessary.
The only one question remains - can we have collectibles (cards) back please?

Toka Koka
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
RPGWatch Donor

#7

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,101

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 17:06
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
Out of curiousity what did you think was better in TW 1 compared to TW2 ?
Speaking for myself, The Witcher I had three rural villages, two of which were surrounded by open-looking countryside (third by a large swamp) and several 'points of interest', as well as an expansive city with a really filthy-looking section that exemplified the popular view of medieval slums.
This gave it a certain 'charm' that was lacking from Witcher II. La Valette Castle and its town looked glorious, but lacked any smaller-scale charm; Flotsam was an outpost (effectively under siege by monsters and Scoia'tael) that seemed to lack real poverty, although its nonhuman residents were clearly disadvantaged. Vergen was a 'mining town', once prosperous and now in decline, but not poor. Loc Muinne was a pile of ruins temporarily inhabited by sorcerors and soldiers.

Because of the choice of locations, Witcher II simply didn't have any real examples of the urban and rural poverty charm that you could find in the first game.
Maybe the camp brothel during Act II came closest.

I did not miss it that much, but I can imagine some people did. I also think that it did add flavour and atmosphere; Witcher II had enough other stuff (comparative to its size), but a big open world game could certainly use it.

BTW, that gryphon looked both filthy and nasty. Usually in modern fantasy it's a 'commodified' handsome, quasi-majestic animal, the feathered pony (sometimes warhorse) of the skies. This one looks like he'll bite yourhead off, rip out your entrails and use your corpse for nest stuffing.
Fluffyhotep is offline

Fluffyhotep

Fluffyhotep's Avatar
Watcher

#8

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Germania Inferior
Posts: 89

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 19:01
I can't say that I have liked TW I more or less than I did TW II but I DO think that in the first game devs went for the detail (and there were some lovely little touches there) and in the second they went for the scope. You just can't have it all I guess…
zahratustra is offline

zahratustra

SasqWatch

#9

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,345

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 19:17
That's exactly what they promises for TW3.
Morrandir is online now

Morrandir

Morrandir's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch
RPGWatch Donor

#10

Join Date: May 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 922

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 19:21
Originally Posted by danutz_plusplus View Post
I think it's because of the fish-lens view that triggers when Geralt uses his senses. At least, that's what it looks like to me.
That would made sense, but they still smudge through stuff strangely to me. They also looks displaced compared to the rest of the very detailed textures around them, but it might not be that bad when you play the game.
azarhal is offline

azarhal

SasqWatch
RPGWatch Donor

#11

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,514

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 22:10
Just saw the short IGN Witcher 3 demo. And man, is Novigrad huge or what. It's gonna be awesome to explore it and the outskirts. Looked amazing. Hopefully they'll upload that soon enough.
danutz_plusplus is offline

danutz_plusplus

danutz_plusplus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#12

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 22:22
I wonder if there is any replayability built in to the system or will the griffon always be there and always leave the same trail?

Also, will there be any real tracking or hunting of monsters or will we just press a button that will highlight a fablesque trail to follow?
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch

#13

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,178

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 22:29
A low-res version of the IGN booth demo can be seen here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wNiiQpDPJE

A higher res one can be seen here. The url skips to exactly the right moment in the ign stream. Just set it to 720p.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ap0…are&t=5h04m58s
Last edited by danutz_plusplus; June 10th, 2014 at 22:44.
danutz_plusplus is offline

danutz_plusplus

danutz_plusplus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#14

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115

Default 

June 10th, 2014, 23:44
Originally Posted by sakichop View Post
I wonder if there is any replayability built in to the system or will the griffon always be there and always leave the same trail?

Also, will there be any real tracking or hunting of monsters or will we just press a button that will highlight a fablesque trail to follow?
These are good questions.

My guess is, these events will be scripted. Why do I think that? Well, the Griffon's blood trail conveniently leads you right through a scripted sequence of a woman being attacked, and one of the dialog options is "I'm hunting a griffon." and she says to come back later when you're done with the hunt. That leads me to believe that this particular hunt is scripted and not dynamic.

I could be wrong, we'll see. It would be cool if the hunts were dynamic and not all scripted events.
Fluent is offline

Fluent

Fluent's Avatar
RPG Fiend
RPGWatch Team

#15

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,236

Default 

June 11th, 2014, 00:29
Originally Posted by Fluent View Post
These are good questions.

My guess is, these events will be scripted. Why do I think that? Well, the Griffon's blood trail conveniently leads you right through a scripted sequence of a woman being attacked, and one of the dialog options is "I'm hunting a griffon." and she says to come back later when you're done with the hunt. That leads me to believe that this particular hunt is scripted and not dynamic.

I could be wrong, we'll see. It would be cool if the hunts were dynamic and not all scripted events.
Good points. I suppose they could be randomly generated per play through but somehow I doubt it.
sakichop is offline

sakichop

SasqWatch

#16

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,178

Default 

June 11th, 2014, 02:35
For the demo on Gamespot's booth, check here.
http://www.gamespot.com/e3/samsung-stage-1-2014/

At 5:30:00 the CDProject guys start their demo

EDIT: IGN uploaded their video in HD.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sufwxU_Uaz4
Last edited by danutz_plusplus; June 11th, 2014 at 06:40.
danutz_plusplus is offline

danutz_plusplus

danutz_plusplus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#17

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115

Default 

June 11th, 2014, 07:25
Originally Posted by GothicGothicness View Post
Out of curiousity what did you think was better in TW 1 compared to TW2 ?
Way more fun and interesting characters, quests, and in my opinion story. More monsters, more mythology, better/bigger/more varied locations. I can name all kinds of interesting stuff from part one, but when it comes to part 2 i think i remember some little Succubus side quest that was interesting. Really, part 2 was a bunch of recycled human enemies over and over again. Nothing like the horrifying vampiric terrors awaiting you in the crypts of part one.

The original was a darker, more fantasy themed tale of mutated supernatural monster slayers. It was ABOUT being a Witcher, which I felt was nearly irrelevant in the sequel. The factions were more diverse and fun, I liked the siding w/ the Squirrels or the Order angle, I played thru as each and had a good time both times.

What was I doing in Witcher 2 again? Oh yeah, i have to run to go meet some co-conspirator or something. I'm sorry, we're talking a bunch of "political intrigue" type shit vs the monster mash of the original I'm gonna go w/ the latter for overall "fun" factor.

Alchemy was also better in the first game, you got a "secondary ingredient" for example that further enhanced what you could make. I liked the original game's inventory system better as well, especially when using alchemy.

Did they patch out the "can only drink potions while meditating" thing? That was a total pain in the ass that wasnt an issue in the first game.

I personally didnt mind the combat in the original, i liked how Geralt would shift up into higher gears and really get furious and start whipping around like a maniac. Part 2 had blocking and such, and ultimately was a better system. Overall however, I am now considering installing Witcher again due to all the talk, yet I have no desire to play 2 again. It just seemed to drag on forever, i just wanted it to end

I could go on, tired of typing tho
Last edited by xSamhainx; June 11th, 2014 at 07:36.
xSamhainx is offline

xSamhainx

xSamhainx's Avatar
Paws of Doom

#18

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,664

Default 

June 11th, 2014, 11:21
And we also have Gamespot's footage in HD. Featuring swamp-land gameplay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3HuAroY1Oo
danutz_plusplus is offline

danutz_plusplus

danutz_plusplus's Avatar
Keeper of the Watch

#19

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,115

Default 

June 11th, 2014, 11:46
Looks great overall, but is it just me or does Geralt look different than in the previous games? I'm not talking about changes due to a new engine. He looks more human now imo with slightly different facial features. I'm not sure I like it.
JDR13 is online now

JDR13

JDR13's Avatar
SasqWatch

#20

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida, US
Posts: 17,828
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - News Roundup
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:39.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch