|
Your continuous donations keep RPGWatch running!
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Obsidian Entertainment - Feargus Urquhart Interview

Default Obsidian Entertainment - Feargus Urquhart Interview

June 9th, 2009, 03:13
How does Feargus Urquhart see the Western RPG industry in 2009? That's the background question to a new interview at Gamasutra. It waffles around to me without really saying much - here's a sample:
So, that's kind of an interesting question then. If you look at the sort of pretty mainstream success of Fallout 3, do you think that they found a way to make a hardcore RPG much more mainstream than has been done in the past? Or when you look at how Fallout 3 is suceeding compared to what you've done on Fallout 2 or other RPGs that you've done…
FU: I think Bethesda did two things, and I'll start with that sort of thing. Any great game, it's beyond how exactly you play it. It's how you play it, and a specific "Are there numbers? and "Are there not numbers?" and all that kind of stuff. It's more of a feeling.
What really was great about the original Fallout, Fallout 1 and Fallout 2, was the feeling of being in this world. And that was attractive. Well, attractive is maybe the wrong word. It was compelling. (laughs) That's a better word.
I think what Bethesda did an incredible job at is making you feel like you are in this Fallout world. And that's what we did back at Black Isle, to make you really feel like you were in this Fallout world. The whole thing — from the loading screens to the main menu to the Pip-Boy to all that kind of stuff — it really felt like it was a whole cohesive unit of feeling like you're in this world. And they did that.
When you do that, it is instantly more compelling to any kind of gamer. As long as they feel like they're not being hindered by something or that something is annoying in the game, then they're probably going to enjoy it. And I guess part of that is also taking it, obviously, from a turn-based PC game to using the Oblivion engine and learning how to use their Oblivion engine and make it Fallout. And that's not to say that it's just Oblivion: Fallout.
I think the second thing that Bethesda did an incredible job at — and this is what they do really well — is they are just behind their games. I think a lot of the success of Fallout 3 in particular — because there are people probably at Bethesda that Fallout 3 is not the kind of game that they play — but they jumped in with both feet, like, "This is the game. We believe in this game." And I think that is why you see a success, too. It's almost catching.
In other words, you have a publisher who's like, "Well, we have these seven games. What do you think?" Bethesda is, "No, you're buying this damn game." So, I think that the success was from both ways. They were able to get the feeling of Fallout, and they really believed in their game. And that belief in the game came through in how they were talking to everybody and pimping it and all that kind of stuff.
More information.
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#1

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

June 9th, 2009, 03:13
Thanks dhruin, and definetly a good sample. This looks as praising Bethesda just because Obsidian got another Fallout job. Yea, Bethesda did an "incredible job" - they've obviously bought Feargus himself!
Yuck!

Toka Koka
joxer is offline

joxer

joxer's Avatar
The Smoker
RPGWatch Donor

#2

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,622

Default 

June 9th, 2009, 03:35
Well he could hardly say that he thought they were terrible and that Fallout 3 was shade of the originals. I think he quite cleverly praised two things that Beth did actually do very well.
Badesumofu is offline

Badesumofu

Badesumofu's Avatar
SasqWatch

#3

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 447

Default 

June 9th, 2009, 12:56
So sad! Being forced to say good things on Fallout3….
Risine is offline

Risine

Watcher

#4

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 50

Default 

June 9th, 2009, 14:45
It's a no brainer that he cannot be illoyal to the one paying the bills. This doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't believe the things he said though.
Gorath is offline

Gorath

Gorath's Avatar
Prime Evil
RPGWatch Team

#5

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,699

Default 

June 9th, 2009, 22:45
Agreed. My comments were meant to be a slam; I just felt he wandered around and gave nebulous answers.

-= RPGWatch =-
Dhruin is offline

Dhruin

Dhruin's Avatar
Watcher
Super Moderator
RPGWatch Team

#6

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,964

Default 

June 10th, 2009, 02:06
He obviously avoided the question and talked about things they did right. I think this probably means Fallout: New Vegas is taking a different direction then Bethesda's Fallout 3 and going more towards the original games.
guenthar is offline

guenthar

SasqWatch

#7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,532
Send a message via Skype™ to guenthar

Default 

June 10th, 2009, 03:11
Originally Posted by Dhruin View Post
Agreed. My comments were meant to be a slam
Really? I missed that with the whole "waffles around without really saying much" thing …

— Mike
txa1265 is online now

txa1265

txa1265's Avatar
SasqWatch

#8

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Corning, NY USA
Posts: 11,271
RPGWatch Forums » Comments » News Comments » Obsidian Entertainment - Feargus Urquhart Interview
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:08.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright by RPGWatch