![]() |
A quality game and one that I'd be very glad to see made these days.
I do agree that some sections far outstay their welcome, and I got bored before the end. If only we'd had two more improved iterations on this model. |
Quote:
I really wish they made the game shorter and sweeter, I preferred Awakening expansion to be honest. |
I finished all of the origin stories, but I've only played through the entire game once. I'll probably play it again someday, but it's not high on my list of gaming priorities.
I can't imagine how anyone could consider it the best RPG ever made. I wouldn't even rank it in my top 5 of RPGs that use RTwP combat. |
Quote:
It baffles me how developers always try to change sequels instead of keeping what works. It's that same philosophy that almost destroyed Mass Effect also. Just look at Pillars of Eternity 2 it kept what made the first game a success, and was improved to make the game better. Just read all the positive reviews to see how. |
The key thing which DA:O did, which few other RPGs have done, is nail the blend of depth & ease of access required to create a game which both hardcore & casual gamers can enjoy.
I remember playing it & thinking how much different it was from the likes of BG, but how most those differences were actually an improvement even if they were watering down certain aspects (e.g. not aving to rest to heal. It just saves messing about & felt more natural than always sleeping) It's an absolute travesty that Bioware didn't stay more faithful to Origins, and just tweaked it slightly for the 2nd & 3rd entries. For me it should have been the foundation to snag casuals & make them more hardcore, as opposed to snagging casuals & then making all the sequels more casual. |
Yes, agree that it strikes very good balance between hardcore and casual. I do wish we will get to play DA:O like game in near future - I love BG2 and am enjoying Pathfinder but sometimes I want to play something a little more casual.
|
Quote:
I think its actually quite a skill to understand how to keep the best elements of a game and how to improve upon them. So many developers fail at it that I think its much easier to say than do. |
I think my answer would have been to change little of the core game, but just create better content for the sequels. Much like the Baldur's Gates, or even the Kotors (the second of which was similarly rushed to DA2, but contained far more quality.)
Also, when the Awesome Button man piped up, to make him walk the plank out the corporate window. |
Yeah who can forget the awesome button.:lol:
loading… His name is David Silverman and he was BioWare's director of marketing. |
Quote:
|
I think Origins was originally pitched as a modern Baldur's Gate, and a lot of the first one bares that out. It was in production for a long time and the tactical pause system is still one of the better ones to date.
It was a good game that kept me all the way to the end. It didn't blow my mind at the time but I think history and reflection has been kind to it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Baldur's Gate to me was pure mayhem in many ways, and not my favourite style of gaming. Origins took that premise, and made it more fun, at least for me. Fun versus chore-oriented.
|
The BG games had a steeper learning curve, but they were sooo much better than DA once you got the hang of combat. I can't imagine anyone thinking DA was superior unless they just wanted something less complex or perhaps they just didn't like the setting in BG.
The biggest difference, for me, was the bestiary. Baldur's Gate had a huge variety of different enemy types throughout the game. In DA, you usually just fought the same 4-5 types of Darkspawn over and over again, and the non-Darkspawn enemy types were generic and boring. The same thing applies to spells and weapons as well. There was just so much more variety in BG. Don't even get me started on races and classes. |
Wow. At release I had very meh opinion of DAO, though it did have it's bright moments. If only I had known the rest of the series could do so much worse.
One of these day maybe I should give it another try and check if time has brought a new perspective on the game. |
See, that's what made Origins such an excellent game, the sheer drek that used the Dragon Age tag afterwards. I only briefly saw the second game before I got my refund, as to any after that, I'd have no knowledge. To me, there is only one Dragon Age game, period.
|
Quote:
|
In my opinion Dragon Age Origins is a great game in terms of graphics, story, role-playing system and all the rest. I've spent many hours, enjoying this high-class game.
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:51. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by
DragonByte Security (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright by RPGWatch